Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BufordP

I think you’re missing the part about the Dems controlling the Senate for the first two years, and GWB never having a conservative majority in the Senate, ever.

By the way, the Dems had a supermajority and couldn’t get health care through. (Miraculously!)

Nice chart though.


284 posted on 02/09/2010 7:51:40 PM PST by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]


To: A.Hun
I think you’re missing the part about the Dems controlling the Senate for the first two years, and GWB never having a conservative majority in the Senate, ever.

You're putting words in my mouth. I'm not missing anything. It's right there on the chart. I didn't say he had a Senate majority in the first two years. I merely presented the chart which shows he had an unprecedented period where he could have accomplished a great deal and he did nothing to shrink the fed.

And I guess your "qualifying" majority in the Senate, ever by saying "conservative majority" as opposed to Republican majority - which he DID have from 2003-2007.

291 posted on 02/09/2010 8:08:40 PM PST by BufordP (Once a Marine - always a Marine ... Until Jack Murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson