Kick them all out.
Welcome to the party pal, what the hell are you going to do about it?
I would have some sarcastic remark to make or post a sarcastic image....But we’re in the same boat.....rowing in shark infested waters....in the middle of a hurricane.....heading for icebergs...
We’re right behind you!
Britain a trial run?
They should shot guns and begin killing labor party members
Nanny state dreams on the morning after the party.
Kick them all out.
Ugghh: “Worries over the pace of social change...” = we are overrun by socialists and muzzies and have lost control of our country.
Man never is, but always to be, blessed.
That photo on post 8 summarizes their problem.
Why the British people stood back and allowed excessive (and misplaced) immigration is a mystery to me.
Not So Great Britain ping
Not as long as they continue to allow the Muslimization of their country. The combination of insane immigration policies, generous welfare programs and huge Muslim families is a formula for culture death. Anyone who is content to sit back and hope that things get better is delusional.
The result of 16 consecutive years of Labour rule.
If we had two consecutive 8-year Democrat presidencies, the result here would be much the same. Far, far too long a period to hand your country over to people who fundamentally hate it and only want to ruin it.
But, thank goodness, they’re politically correct. And they have diversity and multiculturalism.
Why don’t we send Britain all of our muslims? They will let anyone in.
I say send all the 3rd worlders back to where they came from and put a moratorium on all further immigration for at least 20 years.
Obama is using the same playbook here to destroy America.
Changes in citizenship and the regulation of the country’s borders shifted to the federal government only after the Civil War. Responding to abolition and emancipation, Americans in 1869-71 debated the meaning of citizenship; the result was a series of laws and amendments to the constitution-including the Naturalization Act of July 14, 1870-that decisively re-located citizenship from state to federal jurisdiction.
In 1882 came the Chinese Exclusion Act along with the first Immigration Act passed at the federal level to exclude entire categories of foreigners. Thereafter, federal regulation of migration increased. The subsequent Act of 1888 provided for the expulsion of immigrants. The heavily restrictive national origins quotas legislated in 1921 and 1924 effectively ended the mass migrations of the nineteenth century.
Only about 500,000 legal immigrants entered the U.S. in the whole of the 1930s. About a million entered in the 1940s, including World War II refugees. By contrast, of course, the U.S. accepted over 1.5 million immigrants, counting only legals, in the single year of 1990 alone.
The Great Immigration Lull was ended dramatically by the 1965 Immigration Act. Typical of so many Great Society reforms, it was passed amid much moralizing rhetoric and promptly had exactly the opposite of its advertised effect.
U.S. immigration policy was not transformed without debate. There was a debate. It just bore no relationship to what subsequently happened. In particular, staunch defenders of the national-origins quota system, like the American Legion, allowed themselves to be persuaded that the new legislation really enacted a sort of worldwide quota, no longer skewed toward Northern Europe-a policy easily caricatured as "racist" in the era of the civil-rights movement-but still restricting overall immigration to the then-current level of around 300,000. (A detailed account of Congress's deluded intent and the dramatic consequences appears in Lawrence Auster's devastating The Path to National Suicide: An Essay on Immigration and Multiculturalism, published by AICF.)
Today, it is astonishing to read the categorical assurances given by supporters of the 1965 Immigration Act. "What the bill will not do," summarized Immigration Subcommittee chairman Senator Edward Kennedy: "First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same ... Secondly, the ethnic mix will not be upset . . . Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia . . ."
Every one of these assurances has proved false.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Even so, Labour might form the next government if the election were to be held now. The Conservatives are leading, but not by enough to win an outright majority of seats. This means Labour could negotiate a coalition with the Liberals, and stay in power--and nothing would change in the UK. :(