[JerseyDvl]

She will beat the pants off of Jim and Mitch and have them begging to be her VP.
If they try to prove otherwise, these two will fair worse than Fred Thompson.
You will have to abandon the lamestream talking points or sit this one out since Sarah is the future of the Republican Party.
No true conservative can quibble with the fact that she is completely Conservative. The criticism is based on nonsensical talking points that insure we only elect far-left libs.

[sarah fan UK]

No point - Jim D wants to be Mitt’s VP. I take it neither of these two aces were involved in the team cuddle with Obama recently? That stroke of GOP genius helped Obama stabilise his cratering poll numbers.

[Clemenza]

No, she is a politician fond of bumper sticker slogans, who has proven incompetent at challenging the media ie Ronaldus Magnus, nor do I see her developing a strong fundraising base, or recruiting management for her ground game. Having enthusiastic supporters alone won't bring her the nomination.

I've seen the Sarahlian insurgency compared to the Goldwater insurgency of 1964. A major difference was that Barry had a huge family warchest of his own, and key supporters in the oil and mining industries. His biggest weakness was the lack of recruiting strong campaign advisers/managers, despite the enthusiasm from his core supporters, most of whom were ordinary folks like you and I who spent countless hours knocking on doors, putting up posters, etc.