Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McClintock's refusal to consider budget earmarks hurts his district, critics say
Sac Bee ^ | 02/08/2010 | Ed Fletcher

Posted on 02/08/2010 7:30:01 AM PST by notaliberal

As the federal budget season heats up, some Placer County officials are grumbling that Republican Rep. Tom McClintock's ideological opposition to congressional earmarks puts their constituents at a disadvantage.

"It's already hurt us," Supervisor F.C. "Rocky" Rockholm said in a recent interview.

McClintock said he will not seek congressional earmarks – budget requests made outside of the budget process.

"I've made it very clear that I will fight for our district through the normal appropriations process," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: california; honest; mcclintock; statesman
Rocky is going bye bye! We will make sure of it!
1 posted on 02/08/2010 7:30:02 AM PST by notaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: notaliberal

Typical hitpiece.


2 posted on 02/08/2010 7:32:03 AM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal

yes this is the down side of no earmarks.


3 posted on 02/08/2010 7:32:29 AM PST by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal

The refusal to embezzle on behalf of one’s constituents is the kind of “ideology” more politicians should acquire.


4 posted on 02/08/2010 7:34:46 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal

Earmarks are a result of overtaxation that create more overtaxation and a need for more earmarks.

Simply stated, if the money stayed in the district, there would be no need or excuse for the earmarks.


5 posted on 02/08/2010 7:35:25 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

If only we had a thousand more of this guy.

6 posted on 02/08/2010 7:38:35 AM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal

Hey Rock— wasn’t your President Big Ears touting the evils of earmarks? That is until he got elected and pulled one of his many bait and switch moves. Look at the big mess your state and nation is already in with ‘earmarks’. MORONS-— don’t spend more than is taken in——why is that sooo hard to comprehend with these financially challenged ‘tards!


7 posted on 02/08/2010 7:41:46 AM PST by tflabo (Restore the Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

The fact that our last republican congressman wouldn’t seek enough federal money was why the local fishwrap endorsed the democrat last time around.


8 posted on 02/08/2010 7:42:13 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal
The new morality. It's ok to lie, cheat and steal, because everyone else does. The old law, the consequences are still the same.
9 posted on 02/08/2010 7:44:46 AM PST by CarryingOn (Starve the beast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal

McClintock vs earmarks John Wayne style
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrqlP6hzofE


10 posted on 02/08/2010 7:52:35 AM PST by Hotmetal (Lead,follow,or get the Hell out of the way.554th REDHORSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarryingOn

Obama dun say, de other day, no mo’ earmaks bein’ on de way...


11 posted on 02/08/2010 7:52:36 AM PST by outhousepatrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal

Sounds like his opponents are welfare whores screaming “they got theirs, we want ours”...


12 posted on 02/08/2010 8:10:33 AM PST by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
The fact that our last republican congressman wouldn’t seek enough federal money was why the local fishwrap endorsed the democrat last time around.

It must suck to not be able to think of any reason to support their guy, or any other reason to hit the other.

13 posted on 02/08/2010 8:16:15 AM PST by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Those most dependent on Uncle Sugar will always scream the loudest for his ‘love’.


14 posted on 02/08/2010 9:02:35 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal
McClintock's refusal to consider budget earmarks hurts his district, critics say

On the other hand, his integrity and ability to see the "big picture," is preciscely why many of us supported him financially, and would have voted for him if we could.

15 posted on 02/08/2010 7:29:54 PM PST by Publius6961 (He is not America; he is an employee seemingly unable to rise to minimal expectations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
Sounds like his opponents are welfare whores screaming “they got theirs, we want ours”...

Let's hear it for Obama money!

16 posted on 02/08/2010 7:31:14 PM PST by Publius6961 (He is not America; he is an employee seemingly unable to rise to minimal expectations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson