Posted on 02/07/2010 3:50:09 PM PST by USALiberty
Impeachment is NOT going to happen. Unless the Democrats start it.
Recall that, while it takes a majority of the House to impeach, it takes 2/3 of the Senate to convict.
Even if the GOP regains a Senate majority in 2010, there is no way it gains a 2/3 majority.
And, as the Democrats conclusively proved in 1999, they won't vote to convict a Democrat President -- even if they know he's guilty (and they certainly did, Robert Byrd admitted it).
Forget this impeachment crap. It's a wet dream.
You are a scheisskopf.
Nancy will not be speaker of the house after the elections of 2010. I agree almost anyone would be better than Obama as President: Hillary. Newt G. Donald Trump, Jeb Bush, etc...
Who would be worse? Robert Kennedy Jr., Davis Duke, Oprah,
Danny Glover, Keith Obermann, etc...
If the elections are a disaster for the democrats, it’s a safe bed that the democrats will get rid of Nancy as Speaker. She will take the fall!
Obama could pull out a pistol and shoot the Chief Justice and the GOP would not vote to impeach him. Been there, done that.
If they had enough backbone to impeach they would have won the last election.
USALiberty! I want what you’re smoking. If it were only that simple.
Just want a GOP held congress and senate after 2010—we can block the BOZerO from most major screw ups. Then we dump him in 2012.
I’ll settle for neutering the sob.
Impeachment will never happen. Even if it did, we would have a real and bloody civil war/race riot on our hands. The cities would explode in anger.
Take a pill and regroup. Silly thoughts like this take away any credibility conservatives are working to reestablish.
Some of us country folks have an old saying, “Don’t count your chickens before they hatch.”
That said, it’s a pipedream that: (1) The Republicans will capture a supermajority this November. Republicans haven’t had a supermajority in over a century, and the gerrymandering of disctricts gaurantees that they will never capture one again without massive election reform and a return to Constitutional principles; (2) That the Republicans would have either the brains or the guts to attempt impeachment even IF they had a supermajority.
You also assume that “WE” will get back control of Congress. I think it’s likely Republicans will regain control of the House (barely), much less likely they will control the Senate. I figure they will go from the current 41 seats to 48, maybe 49 at best. With the divide that close, I look for the Media to demand — and for the Democrats to “suggest” that the Republicans be “nice,” share power, etc...and I expect the Republicans to do just that — in a spirit of “bipartisanship.” Remember, there will still be plenty of McCainiac-types in the Republican ranks.
Attempting to impeach Obama, at least as matters currently stand, probably wouldn’t be the smartest strategy anyway. It would likely actually build sympathy for him — as it did with Clinton.
Ya gotta think these things thru folks!
Gee, I thought the GOP House voted to impeach Clinton. And that they gained a majority of the Senate...but failed to get the 2/3 vote they needed because the Democrats, even knowing Clinton was guilty, wouldn't vote to convict.
So, how is it the Republicans failed you, brother?
Maybe you have a point. Do we really need a wit before 2013? [I hate teepos.]
FRiend, a party that’s too cowardly to make a big issue out of this certainly doesn’t have the wit:
Another Pardon, Another Controversy
http://speakout.com/activism/news/5653-1.html
Hugh Rodham [Hillary’s brother] received a contingency fee in connection with a pardon ... a scheme to distribute 800 pounds of crack cocaine
Imagine if Bush had pardoned a crack dealer for cash. How quiet would the DNC and the Drive-bys have been about it? The RNC is so issues-focused, they are obsessed about giving the DNC cover. It’s apparently been that way ever since Joe MacArthy. Conservative leaders have always held their punches. They rationalize away their fear.
Now for the nitty-gritty.
- - -
Excellent Certifigate Summary by Diogenesis [The thread starts off lame, but post 15 is a major link blast on the topic.]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2445716/posts?page=15#15
Poll — 58% of Repbulicans question Obama’s Constitutional Qualification
http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0709/58_of_GOP_not_suredont_beleive_Obama_born_in_US.html
Conventioneers cheer Obama-eligibility challenge
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=124336
Farah: ‘I say, if it’s been settled show us the birth certificate. Simple’
- - -
“New Coach” Comparison:
Such a question to remain festering is inexcusable in a leader. A team sees some guy walking into the locker room claiming to be their new coach. How much should they trust him? Is it their fault if they wonder?
The coach says, “I was sent here by the other team.” [Annenberg vetting Obama]. Such ‘leadership’.
The Hippies Who “Certified” Obama
http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/AnnenbergFactCheckers.htm
[Obama was vetted by Annenberg. Does that ring a bell? Annenberg funded Obama AND unrepentent terrorist, Bill Ayers. Obama and the terrorist had offices near each other thanks to the fox who guarded the vetting henhouse.]
The coach’s assistant hands them a forgery:
ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: FINAL REPORT ON OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY ...
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html
Blogger admits Hawaii birth certificate forgery, subverting Obama claims (Uh-oh)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2040486/posts
PROVEN: Barack Obama Presented Forged Certificate of Live Birth ...
http://conservativepolitics.today.com/2008/06/25/proven-barack-obama-presented-forged-certificate-of-live-birth/
Now we should REALLY trust him, right?
- - -
Obama law tab up to $1.4 million
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=106138
Obama birth certificate lawsuits - Conservapedia
http://www.conservapedia.com/Obama_birth_certificate_lawsuits
WHY DOESN’T HE JUST SHOW US HIS FRIGGING BIRTH CERTIFICATE? What kind of goofball would rather spend 1.5 million? Or does he WANT discord in the military? Is this LEADERSHIP?
There are too many snarky “dignity freaks” who are more worried about their image than the truth. They fear ridicule. They calculate. And they will never get along with hardworking conservative muckrakers.
Not knowing it, the sarcastic “Dignity Mossad” is like a coward in the foxhole who stabs his buddy in the back and surrenders. Either that, or he’s a hideous combination of mental laziness and self righteous judgmentality.
Maelstorm: “There is no need for Glenn Beck, Breitbart, or anyone to defend a President who refuses to release his education records, his medical records, and yes he still hasn’t released a long form birth certificate.”
CaptainK: “All jobs require detailed information about your past. Why should the most important job in the nation get a pass?”
President Biden? LOL!
He was selected as insurance against BHO being impeached.
It is not possible to impeach and impostor since he isn't a president he is a fraud.
So?...All a Republican majority needs to do is to legally request he records.
LOL!!
Oh yes, that impeachment thing worked out so well for us even when we had an actual crime to work with.
What do you plan to specify as the “crime” beyond philosophical disagreements?
Great job of typing, considering you are probably wearing a straitjacket.
LOL! Post of the year!
It would have to be serious chages for another Prez to be impeached. The Clinton impeachment was a farce. No one in their right mind would attempt it again without the backing of the American people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.