To: JasonC
Thomas More legal team would not take a case that was, as you say, ‘stoooopid.’
They wouldn’t waste time on a case that didn’t have merit.
Thomas More, ACLJ, and other Constitution Defending Attorneys ROCK! If you have an extra few dollars, please contribute to them.
8 posted on
02/05/2010 4:44:32 PM PST by
HighlyOpinionated
(The left have become lawless. Every strangling edict they issue carries an exemption for themselves.)
To: sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; dennisw; FromLori
Thomas More legal team would not take a case that was, as you say, ‘stoooopid.’ They wouldn’t waste time on a case that didn’t have merit. Thomas More, ACLJ, and other Constitution Defending Attorneys ROCK! If you have an extra few dollars, please contribute to them.This is very interesting. A federal judge ruled that the plaintiff has standing to conduct discovery on the AIG takeover because AIG supports Sharia law (and Sharia law would establish a religion if it had the power).
46 posted on
02/05/2010 9:17:14 PM PST by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Pat Caddell: Democrats are drinking kool-aid in a political Jonestown)
To: HighlyOpinionated
Yes, they would, because they have. They are morons and deserve to be laughed out of court.
50 posted on
02/06/2010 12:37:41 AM PST by
JasonC
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson