Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; dennisw; FromLori
Thomas More legal team would not take a case that was, as you say, ‘stoooopid.’ They wouldn’t waste time on a case that didn’t have merit. Thomas More, ACLJ, and other Constitution Defending Attorneys ROCK! If you have an extra few dollars, please contribute to them.

This is very interesting. A federal judge ruled that the plaintiff has standing to conduct discovery on the AIG takeover because AIG supports Sharia law (and Sharia law would establish a religion if it had the power).

46 posted on 02/05/2010 9:17:14 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Pat Caddell: Democrats are drinking kool-aid in a political Jonestown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

“This is very interesting. A federal judge ruled that the plaintiff has standing to conduct discovery on the AIG takeover because AIG supports Sharia law (and Sharia law would establish a religion if it had the power). “

Man, that is bizare.


60 posted on 02/06/2010 4:36:18 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson