To: sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; dennisw; FromLori
Thomas More legal team would not take a case that was, as you say, stoooopid. They wouldnt waste time on a case that didnt have merit. Thomas More, ACLJ, and other Constitution Defending Attorneys ROCK! If you have an extra few dollars, please contribute to them.This is very interesting. A federal judge ruled that the plaintiff has standing to conduct discovery on the AIG takeover because AIG supports Sharia law (and Sharia law would establish a religion if it had the power).
46 posted on
02/05/2010 9:17:14 PM PST by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Pat Caddell: Democrats are drinking kool-aid in a political Jonestown)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
“This is very interesting. A federal judge ruled that the plaintiff has standing to conduct discovery on the AIG takeover because AIG supports Sharia law (and Sharia law would establish a religion if it had the power). “
Man, that is bizare.
60 posted on
02/06/2010 4:36:18 AM PST by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson