Posted on 02/05/2010 12:38:58 PM PST by pissant
From ThinkProgress.org: Amanda Terkel gives us this gem from this morning's Imus interview with "Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace. This Sunday FNC contributor Sarah Palin will appear for the first time in her new capacity on "Fox News Sunday".
IMUS: When you interview her, will she be sitting on your lap? (LAUGHTER)
WALLACE: One can only hope. (LAUGHTER)
Imus's response to that: "Oh man, thank you."
See the full story and video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediabistro.com ...
IPUS also thought it would be a wonderful idea if Couric was in the booth with Phil Simms and Jim Nance for the Super Bowl.
He does insist he’s off the sauce but it’s really hard to tell.
And these men (Imus and Wallace) are supposed to be on OUR side? (Fox) Imus is the most disgusting piece of work. I don’t know why anybody watches, or listens, to him. I liked it better when he was fired and cast into no-man’s-land.
Did Imus mean “puppet like” or..............???
I think ??? applies here
Imus has a problem. I don’t believe in shrinks, but he needs to seek some help.
I liked Wallace’s answer.
I would more expect it to be the other way around.
Imus is stupid, fugly and evil.
LLS
Imus remains a drunken pig.
I never listen to Imus, but this was being discussed on “Fox & Friends” this morning (Chris Wallace was talking about his trip to Nashville with the regular F&F crew). It got a bit awkward.
It's one thing to think it but really stupid for him to say it.
The one morning I slept through Fox ‘n Friends.... HECK!
And we’re supposed to believe journalists can decide who should be considered the “intellectuals” in the nation?
Imus is a putz.
I don’t know why Hannity has propped up Imus, or why Fox ever hired him. I never thought he was entertaining.
Here’s a description of Wallace’s lame attempt to deny being on the other side, per wikipedia:
“On October 11, 2006, The Washington Post revealed that Wallace had been a registered Democrat for more than two decades. Wallace explained his party affiliation in terms of pragmatism, insisting that being a Democrat is the only feasible means of participating in the political process in heavily Democratic Washington, D.C. He maintained he had voted for candidates from both major parties in the past.[5]”
I find it very insulting myself.
imus is proof, once a stupid fracking alcoholic, always a stupid fracking alcoholic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.