You’re the first person I’ve seen use “Precedent” in a facetious way to describe the President. For good reason. At a minimum, it requires a /sarc tag. For a fleeting moment, I thought you might be substituting one word for another in a lame attempt at humor, but I dismissed that notion based on the absurdity of your attempt at twice-removed sarcasm. It’s not that it went over my head, it’s just that it isn’t that clever. Good try, though.
It’s not that it went over my head, it’s just that it isn’t that clever.
Heh heh....
I give you a B for snap and snark. Sharp tongue, and a well-constructed invalidation.