Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SallyH

“Show me where she agrees with McAmnesty’s positions?”

______________________

PALIN: “. We - our policy - John McCain has been so clear with his policy and it makes a lot of sense too. We secure our borders first. But then with a comprehensive approach we must deal humanely with those who are here, and we must allow the steps to be taken to protect the families of those who are here, maybe as illegal immigrants today.....”

http://reuters.viewdle.com/video/Palin+addresses+Chavez+and+illegal+immigration+in+first+Spanish+interv...?vid=reuters-3009-USA-PALIN-1224643320.mpg&pid=1061d1c341ca60d466cf2db77ea52811


136 posted on 02/04/2010 10:40:09 AM PST by AuntB (If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: AuntB

December 2009

Lars Larson radio talk show

LARS: The amnesty proposal that was defeated in Congress — in your view, was that amnesty for illegals and would you back amnesty for a path to citizenship, as the current president calls it?

SARAH PALIN: No, I’m not for amnesty. Let’s ratchet this down quite simply to remember what we’re referring to. Illegal aliens are called “illegal” for a reason.

We need to secure our borders and I am not for amnesty. And there are humane ways to deal with the 11-13 million illegal aliens who are in our country right now, but if they’re not going to follow the rules, they need to get out.


140 posted on 02/04/2010 10:41:18 AM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson