Skip to comments.
Disappointed With Sarah, Again
Vanity
| 2/4/09
Posted on 02/04/2010 9:35:43 AM PST by dangus
Sarah endorses INCREASING immigration with Glenn Beck:
PALIN: Let me address legal immigration and we need to continue to be so welcoming and inviting of those who are represented there by our Statue of Liberty. The immigrants, of course, built this country. And I think republicans, conservatives are at fault when we allow the other side to capture this immigration issue and try to turn this issue into something negative for republicans. I think we need to recognize that again, immigrants built this great country. There are rules to follow if you want to be a part of this great country. Let's make sure people are following the rules. But let's welcome this. BECK: Do you agree with me make the door wider and make it easier to bring people in, you know, Bill Gates said, I have a hard time keeping people here because it's so complex. Make, just streamline it and make it easier for people to come in the right way.
PALIN: Every part of bureaucracy needs to be streamlined, absolutely. And people do need to come in the right way. They cannot take advantage of what this country has to offer. The opportunities, the help that is here, they need to do this legally
When Gov. Palin endorsed Sen. John McCain, I was forgiving, because they had been part of a team. But Palin has also endorsed Sen. Lindsey Graham, the man whose hatred for conservatives and grassroots is exceeded in the Republican Party only by Sen. Arlen Specter. Oh, wait... I'm not saying Gov. Palin is evil, liberal, or statist. But I've been pleading with people to find out what she actually stands for before they stampede to someone based on their personality and/or presence. Maybe she can still be reached, but I'm developing severe concerns we may be on the threshold of lunging headlong to yet another candidate who doesn't represent the conservative viewpoint.
Again, I emphasize she's not necessarily bad, but we should find out exactly how she stands on:
- "Normalizing" the status of illegal immigrants
- Appointing strict constitutionalists to the Supreme Court
- Eliminating government programs which are not the clear domain of the federal government
- Permitting freedom of political speech (as opposed to supporting McCain-Feingold)
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; dangus; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; mccain; palin; pathtocitizenship; shamnesty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 361-365 next last
To: Man50D
You dodged the question.
Who is your pick?
221
posted on
02/04/2010 11:36:10 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: dangus
She is talking about legal immigration and she stresses that more than once. I notice however that you only highlighted the parts that you thought made her sound pro-illegal, which she is not.
222
posted on
02/04/2010 11:36:52 AM PST
by
calex59
To: ansel12
:Do you see what I meant when I posted this about Man50D?
It can't be said enough with all the OP elitists who have helped their party and the country incrementally move down the socialist path over many years.
Are you actually proud of the fact the OP wing of the socialist Republicrat party has contributed to the current mess we are in today? The fact you don't have any better response than attempting to divert attention away from the Palin-McAmnesty association reveal the depth of your desperation.
223
posted on
02/04/2010 11:37:00 AM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Man50D
OK... So it looks like you don't like the GOP or the DNC.
Who then? LP? AIP? CP?
Or are you just here to stir the pot with your highly parsed and deeply flawed arguments?
224
posted on
02/04/2010 11:39:50 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: Canedawg
Wrong again, Bonzo. I waited to see who YOU favored before I replied to you. Your intellectual cowardice in failing to put forth a candidate in whom you believe leaves you as no more than a heckler in the peanut gallery, with nothing to offer but empty shells.
Ah yes, spewing the invectives. Alinksy must be proud of you. Trying to avoid Palin's undying devotion to a socialist sympathizer couldn't be more intellectually cowardly.
225
posted on
02/04/2010 11:40:08 AM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Man50D
This seems a simple enough response.
You do not want us to support the Republican party at all, so they are off the list.
Now, which party do you want us to support?
226
posted on
02/04/2010 11:40:22 AM PST
by
ansel12
(anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
To: Dead Corpse
I have asked several Palin haters who they support and all you get is no answer, or I haven’t picked one yet.
Answers of cowards. They can’t defend their candidates
and why they refuse to say.
227
posted on
02/04/2010 11:41:01 AM PST
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: Dead Corpse
<
Nice try. Try focusing on the theme of the thread. Why does Palin kiss up to a socialist sympathizer.?
228
posted on
02/04/2010 11:41:26 AM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Dead Corpse
Or are you just here to stir the pot with your highly parsed and deeply flawed arguments?
Are you ignoring Palin's sucking up to McAmnesty because you can't deal with her relationship with a socialist light candidate?
229
posted on
02/04/2010 11:43:07 AM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: Man50D
and why do you kiss up to socialist talking points
230
posted on
02/04/2010 11:43:21 AM PST
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: Man50D
You’re avoiding the main inquiry: who do you favor in 2012?
231
posted on
02/04/2010 11:43:58 AM PST
by
Canedawg
(Our government has become a travesty.)
To: dangus
She turned me into a newt.
232
posted on
02/04/2010 11:44:46 AM PST
by
NeoCaveman
(usually clean, often articulate, only a slight Cro-Magnon accent except when I want to have one)
To: dangus
UTTERLY DISINGENUOUS CRAP!
She is FOR Legal immigration - AGAINST illegal!
233
posted on
02/04/2010 11:44:47 AM PST
by
BillM
To: ansel12
This seems a simple enough response.
You do not want us to support the Republican party at all, so they are off the list.
How's that explanation of Palin endorsing a socialist loving candidate going?
234
posted on
02/04/2010 11:44:52 AM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: SoCalPol
They know they'd get smacked around like a tetherball if they did.
I've been on the end of that rope. I was a big fan of Harry Browne at one point. Michael Badnarik too. Getting smacked around here can happen when you try to take a principled stance.
No. I do not support Ron Paul for President. Hunter was my first choice last election. Just to forestall that nonsense.
Still, I like what I saw of Palin during the last election. I've read her book. Her stances on Freedom, RKBA, etc... are pretty much in line with mine.
Doesn't mean I'm going to keep her on as a "short duration personal savior", but I would vote for her as President.
235
posted on
02/04/2010 11:44:58 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: Man50D
Why does Palin kiss up to a socialist sympathizer.? Settling a debt. Good chess move.
Who is your pick?
236
posted on
02/04/2010 11:45:40 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: Man50D
Are you ignoring Palin's sucking up...
You are the only one making that claim. One that has proven to be much less of an issue than you are trying to make it.
Who is your pick?
237
posted on
02/04/2010 11:46:34 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: Dead Corpse
>> Sarah didn’t say what is being implied. It isn’t her position.
For anyone that wants Hayworth to win AZ., Palin’s support for McCain has a significant, negative impact on the race. This is not an example of “head and shoulders above the rest” activity.
>> And yeah, she really is the best positioned Nationally to take on Zero in 2012.
She certainly created a political vacuum.
Yes, Palin deserves the positive response she garnered.
238
posted on
02/04/2010 11:46:52 AM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
To: NeoCaveman
Yeah, but you look good in green. ;-)
239
posted on
02/04/2010 11:46:59 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: Gene Eric
She endorsed McCain. She isn't out there stumping for him or shoveling cash his way.
If this gets him off her back come 2012, it's still a good chess move.
240
posted on
02/04/2010 11:48:05 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 361-365 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson