Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brown arriving in Senate a week early; Dems scramble
Washington Examiner ^ | 2-4-2010 | Susan Ferrechio

Posted on 02/03/2010 7:40:17 PM PST by smoothsailing

Brown arriving in Senate a week early; Dems scramble

By: Susan Ferrechio
Chief Congressional Correspondent
February 4, 2010

With Republican Sen.-elect Scott Brown of Massachusetts headed to Washington to be sworn in Thursday -- a week earlier than expected -- Democrats were scrambling to push through union-friendly nominees for key posts in the Obama administration.

Brown asked Massachusetts election officials to certify his win immediately and now he is expected to be sworn in during an afternoon ceremony. He will become the chamber's 41st Republican, which will give the party enough votes to block controversial nominees like Craig Becker, President Obama's pick to fill one of three vacancies on the National Labor Relations Board -- someone who businesses fear will be able to implement pro-union changes that Democrats couldn't achieve through legislation.

Labor unions, which poured significant amounts of money and time into getting President Obama elected, had anticipated last year that Congress would quickly pass a bill allowing unions to organize a company's work force without a secret-ballot vote. But sufficient support for the bill never materialized in the Senate.

Republicans and pro-business groups fear Becker could push implementation of so called "card check" provisions in his role on the NLRB.

Becker, who is the former top lawyer for the Service Employees International Union and the AFL-CIO, wrote in a 1993 journal article that union rules should be re-drafted to favor labor and shrink the rights of employers.

"Mr. Becker has been a strong advocate of the Employee Free Choice Act and is likely to effect similar changes at the board level that cannot currently be achieved in Congress," said Denise Gold, associate general counsel for labor and employment law at the Association of General Contractors.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers also oppose Becker's nomination.

Becker told senators at a hearing on Tuesday that he would not use his position to alter labor laws in opposition to business groups and said his 1993 article was meant to be "provocative and to ask fundamental questions in order for scholars and others to re-evaluate."

A committee vote on Becker could happen Thursday, after which the full Senate can consider his nomination.

Brown aides won't say whether Brown would cast his first vote for or against Becker, but the looming vote on his nomination is one of the reasons Brown is anxious to quickly take his seat.

Republicans complained on Monday when Democrats put forward the nomination of Patricia Smith to become the Labor Department's next top lawyer. Smith cleared a key procedural hurdle in the Senate on Monday with exactly 60 Democratic votes.

Smith is a former commissioner of the New York State labor department, where she developed a pro-union program aimed at improving labor-law compliance.

"The concern is that she wouldn't be an impartial advocate in her position of solicitor and would put a heavy thumb on the scale in favor of the unions," said James Sherk a labor policy scholar at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.

sferrechio@washingtonexaminer.com



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 111th; ma2010; scottbrown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: DJ MacWoW

Well, we will have to change that; won’t we?


21 posted on 02/03/2010 8:33:48 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Are they working to get that stench of stale booze out of the office?


22 posted on 02/03/2010 8:36:19 PM PST by OrangeHoof ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Bend over suckahs".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Yes we can! lol


23 posted on 02/03/2010 8:37:01 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba

To my way of thinking, he could have been seated on Jan. 20th, based on existing precedent.


24 posted on 02/03/2010 8:49:27 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The media think that saying it’s a week early makes it so - when in reality it’s 15 days late already. I think he won that election on January 19th!

Now, if it was the other way around - the media would be howling about abuse of power!

I hope Scott Brown retains his sense of fighting for what is right. I hope his military training keeps him strong!


25 posted on 02/03/2010 9:22:53 PM PST by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Not a peep


26 posted on 02/03/2010 11:04:17 PM PST by Outlaw Woman (If you remove the first Amendment, we'll be forced to move on to the next one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

I completely agree with you... where are the LEADERS??????? Where are they???????? Crickets. Is the GOP dead?


27 posted on 02/03/2010 11:21:24 PM PST by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: onyx

How long till we get a RINO alert on this thread? There are so many things a senator votes on, major and minor, where party does make a difference beyond ideology or a particular issue.


28 posted on 02/03/2010 11:29:29 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Bet Reid tells him: “Your papers are not in order”


29 posted on 02/03/2010 11:36:16 PM PST by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
"How long till we get a RINO alert on this thread?"

I'm not starting a thread on this but this guy will be a definite RINO. Just wait until we see some of his early voting.
He has to go left a lot of the time simply because he wants to get reelected in two years.

Still glad he won. The alternative was not pretty.
Stick it in your ear rabid liberals.

30 posted on 02/04/2010 6:43:48 AM PST by AGreatPer (Impeach Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson