Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No More Army Humvees; Lots More MRAPS
DOD Buzz ^ | 2/1/2010 | Colin Clark

Posted on 02/03/2010 1:25:35 AM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

The Humvee, which replaced the Jeep, will no longer be bought by the Army.

While Arnold Schwarzengger certainly helped boost the Hunvee’s public profile, it has never achieved the legendary status of the Jeep and its vulnerability to land mines (aka IEDs) made it something of a anachronism until much heavier armored versions were deployed.

While the service won’t buy any more Humvees, the Army is not getting rid of them.

“The Army is not buying more Humvees but other people buy Humvees so the line is not terminated. We envision the Humvee to be an enduring part of the Army fleet for a long time,” Army Lt. Gen. Edgar Stanton, the military deputy in the Army comptroller’s office, told reporters during a Q and A session after the Army budget briefing today.

While announcing that the Army’s “needs for this vehicle have been met” for new Humvees, the Pentagon also made clear that the need for MRAPs of various stripes have certainly not been met.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that Central Command has a requirement for 10,600 more MRAPs. He broke the buy down, saying that the Pentagon plans to buy 6,600 more M-​​ATVs, the more agile off-​​road MRAPs made by Oshkosh, and another 4,000 regular MRAPs. Most of those will go to Afghanistan. There is $1.1 billion requested in the 2011 budget for MRAPs, according to the OSD budget overview.

(Excerpt) Read more at dodbuzz.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: centralcommand; humvee; mrap; usarmy

1 posted on 02/03/2010 1:25:35 AM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

I can’t wait till surplus Humvees are available to civilians. I am so getting one. with a turret cupola.


2 posted on 02/03/2010 1:52:58 AM PST by RC one (WHAT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Good. Or maybe it’s because the namesake is owned now by the Chicoms.

The MRAPS are nastier looking than that confined, rolling death-mobile that cost the lives of American soldiers when simply armoring the bottom, for starters, to protect them from IED’s, would have sufficed.


3 posted on 02/03/2010 2:24:29 AM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

How did I ever survive 20+ years in the army without all that armor protection....................


4 posted on 02/03/2010 3:05:47 AM PST by Sarajevo (You're jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana
Soviet TM landmines are stackable. One will penetrate a tank hull and kill the crew inside.


5 posted on 02/03/2010 3:10:55 AM PST by RC one (WHAT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: max americana
"...The MRAPS are nastier looking than that confined, rolling death-mobile that cost the lives of American soldiers when simply armoring the bottom, for starters, to protect them from IED’s, would have sufficed..."


Humvee shortcomings likely weren't due to a demonic plan by the manufacturer.
Our terrorist enemies changed their tactics and the MRAP is our vastly-improved battlefield tool.

6 posted on 02/03/2010 3:21:51 AM PST by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
Can't wait to see the rappers pimp these out...


7 posted on 02/03/2010 3:36:14 AM PST by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Soviet TM landmines are stackable. One will penetrate a tank hull and kill the crew inside.
~~~
These will kill most tanks,,,not all,,,

A close friend drove a HETT in the 1083rd.Trans (2003),,,

Most of what he hauled were Bradley/Hummers that were toast.

As you know if 1-2 won’t work use 5-6 to get the job done...


8 posted on 02/03/2010 3:55:36 AM PST by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch
My son's team has these over in Afghanistan. No turret gunner means less deaths.
9 posted on 02/03/2010 3:57:34 AM PST by Recon Dad ( USMC SSgt Patrick O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 106)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
The Humvee, which replaced the Jeep ...
... it has never achieved the legendary status of the Jeep and its vulnerability to land mines ...

Originally the Humvee was supposed to be a replacement for the jeep. That changed when people started complaining that it was vulnerable to mines and rockets (like the jeeps wasn’t?). The Humvee had to become a replacement for the APC, complete with heavy armor. Troops were still occasionally injured, we need more, heavier armor!
And the enemy will make heavier, more powerful mines.

I look at pictures of the Cougar MRAP, at 33,000 pounds I wonder how agile it is off road. My Jeeps could go anywhere - well, it couldn’t push down trees and wasn’t amphibious, but was a good go anywhere transporter. I also wonder how long it takes the passengers inside the MRAPs to get out.
There’s also the matter of cost, at over half a million for the base vehicle before adding assessors some versions will approach a million. I know, cost is no object when it comes to our military - but it is a factor. What equipment will we lose to pay for these? Many want to discontinue the MBT because of cost, and look what happened to the F-22 and F-35.

10 posted on 02/03/2010 3:58:42 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

More importnantly, why is our military used as police officers in a hostile environment such that these vehicles are needed? Why are they not instead engaged in a war whereby they are to kill people and break things instead of trying to play “peace keeper”?


11 posted on 02/03/2010 7:19:51 AM PST by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Soviet TM landmines are stackable. One will penetrate a tank hull and kill the crew inside.

You’re not kidding.

No armor can protect against a concussion kill.

The bosnian war gave us a glimps of that as they use to stack 8-10 AT mines along the ditches on the side of the road and then make it obvious that they mined the center of the road. Tanks (in the beginning) would simply drive around the obvious mines and then mysteriously disappear in a cloud of smoke...

I’m sure the MRAPs do a better job than the 1/8th inch hummvee skin.


12 posted on 02/03/2010 9:26:12 AM PST by 1st I.D Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
the Cougar MRAP, at 33,000 pounds I wonder how agile it is off road.

Exactly. Life is full of trade offs. I would want all the armor I could get, if my life and limbs were on the line.

But as you say, more armor means fewer places you can go. Do you walk to those places you can't drive, or just leave the to the enemy? More armor means not just fewer places you can go, but fewer bridges/causeways/crossings that you can use to get to the places you can go. Which channels you into easily identifiable routes, and lets the enemy know just where to mine/mortar/ambush.

I don't know where to draw the line, but more armor isn't always better.

13 posted on 02/03/2010 9:51:31 AM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

I guess because we’re supposed to be a “Peace Loving Nation”. I always thought we were one of the most warlike nations on earth.


14 posted on 02/04/2010 4:49:18 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

Restricting ourselves to using roads does make it easy for the bad guys.


15 posted on 02/04/2010 4:51:17 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Necessity is always the mother of invention, military advances are never in a static procession, one side makes armor, the other side makes anti-armor ammunition.

They make a seeking torpedo, we make an anti-torpedo.

Land mines can be defeated, though its not probably feasible to use in most cases hovercrafts can skim over landmines, or until a hovercraft landmine is built.

Sometime in the near future we will develop the technology for sustained literal off road capability or in tech speak a lifting device that could theoretically be gravity nullifying or dampening.


16 posted on 02/04/2010 4:59:57 AM PST by Eye of Unk (The Seven-headed Beast of Revelation 12, 13, and 17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Keep dreaming. Law/contract says civvies won’t get any.


17 posted on 02/04/2010 5:05:13 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Pelosi is practically President; the Obama is just her talk show host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
money talks

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1992-AM-GENERAL-TAN-MILITARY-USMC-HUMVEE-SLANT-BACK_W0QQitemZ230432486406QQcmdZViewItemQQptZMilitary_Vehicles?hash=item35a6d8b406

18 posted on 02/04/2010 5:28:25 AM PST by RC one (WHAT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson