Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster

They need to account for walk-aways in these stats. I knew a flipper who had 11 houses when the bottom fell out. There was no way.

Another guy bought a $500,000 house that fell to half that a year later.

There are circumstances where the right thing to do is to walk away. The poor little innocent mortgage companies knew what they were doing when they gave the loan. It is a deal you give me money to buy the house. If I don’t pay, you get the house. Walking away is a legitimate and legal business transaction based on changing circumstances.

Neither of these guys is going to be homeless. They didn’t get fired or go through a layoff. They simply exercise an option of their loan agreement.


5 posted on 02/02/2010 7:11:32 AM PST by 240B (he is doing everything he said he would'nt and not doing what he said he would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 240B
Depends on the state. In some states, the lender's recourse is limited to the property, but in many others the difference between the outstanding principal and the liquidation value of the property remains a debt of the borrower.

In the old days, when property value only went up, most banks wouldn't bother to chase down the borrower because the residual debt wasn't large enough to warrant the additional cost.

These days, however, more banks are making continued additional payments a condition of short-sale agreements, and are hunting down deadbeat borrowers who leave the keys in the mailbox.

8 posted on 02/02/2010 8:09:03 AM PST by boomstick (I really underestimated the creepiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson