Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia, Venezuela set up $20B oil venture
Calgary Herald ^ | Feb 1, 2010 | Reuters

Posted on 02/02/2010 5:25:35 AM PST by thackney

Russia and Venezuela will invest $20 billion over 40 years in a giant Venezuelan oilfield to produce almost half a million barrels per day of oil that can be shipped to U.S. markets, Russian officials said on Monday.

A consortium of Russian firms and Venezuela's state-run PDVSA agreed on Monday to set up a venture to tap the Junin 6 oil field in the Orinoco oil belt, which Venezuela says has the world's largest hydrocarbon reserves.

"I don't rule out it (supplies) could be to U.S. markets," Russia's top energy official, Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin, said after the signing ceremony overseen by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin.

Sechin said production could reach 450,000 barrels per day.

The deal heralds close political and economic cooperation between Moscow and Caracas, which has previously bought Russian weapons and recognised Georgia's pro-Kremlin breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

"After today's agreement is ratified by the parliament of Venezuela, the consortium of Russian firms will transfer a bonus amounting to $600 million," Putin said.

A U.S. government report showed last month Venezuela's Orinoco oil region could contain about 513 billion barrels of crude that could technically be recovered by energy companies if cost were not an issue, making it the world's top oil region.

Venezuela is the third-largest foreign supplier of crude oil and refined petroleum products to the United States.

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has repeatedly threatened to cut supplies to U.S. markets, although these threats have failed to materialise.

Russia has said previously that exploration of the Junin 6 oil field could require $30 billion in investment, while PDVSA has said the field has the potential to produce 200,000 barrels per day.

Russian companies in the project include Rosneft, Gazprom, LUKOIL, TNK-BP and Surgutneftegaz, which together hold 40 percent. PDVSA has the remaining 60 percent.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; heavyoil; oil
Note the time frame:

over 40 years

1 posted on 02/02/2010 5:25:35 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

Russia is a worthy “partner” for Hugo- let Chavez just try to seize and nationalize Russian assets.


2 posted on 02/02/2010 5:29:10 AM PST by silverleaf (My Proposed Federal Budget is $29.99)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Isn’t the crude oil in Orinoco oil belt thick a peanut butter? An very close to impossible to extract?


3 posted on 02/02/2010 5:31:59 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado

I believe it is very similar to Athabascan Oil Sands and some means of removing the petroleum include steam injections.

More than you wanted to know at:

THE ORINOCO HEAVY OIL BELT IN VENEZUELA
http://cohesion.rice.edu/naturalsciences/earthscience/research.cfm?doc_id=2819


4 posted on 02/02/2010 5:36:44 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Fine, the incompetent Venezuelan thugs will grind through that capital too.


5 posted on 02/02/2010 5:59:32 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
When you go out looking for partners and there are no takers, you have to partner up with what's left. You're right, now try and nationalize and see what happens.

I would think that any new production in the Western Hemisphere is good for us.

6 posted on 02/02/2010 6:12:05 AM PST by Recon Dad ( USMC SSgt Patrick O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

It’s a world market. Any new production will add downward price pressure unless consumption ramps up.


7 posted on 02/02/2010 6:24:19 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Absolutely!. Chavez is between a rock and hard place to keep the cash flowing so even though his oil sells for about 30% less than sweet he has to keep it flowing or he's out.
We are pretty much the only people that can refine this heavy oil.
The President I want is the person who runs on a platform to do away with our dependence on these foreign sources and shows us the way to do it. I believe it can be done.
8 posted on 02/02/2010 8:18:33 AM PST by Recon Dad ( USMC SSgt Patrick O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
Hugo has removed some Venezuelan products from the American market. Venz roofing asphalt was the most desirable feedstock for making shingles and dominated the industry for decades. Now this product is blended off and sent to China for a lower netback to the national oil company.
9 posted on 02/02/2010 8:23:52 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Could you give us a quick lesson on the cost of extracting and refining heavy sour crude from oil sands? Is there any rule of thumb by which this oil is discounted vis-a-vis, say, West Texas Intermediate?


10 posted on 02/02/2010 8:28:47 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

I’ll look for some cost of extraction from Candian Sands. Keep in mind cost has little to do with price except to fund projects or shut down existing. Nobody buying cares that it cost you more than a West Texas pump jack.

Price is a function of quality. Heavy oil sells for less because it cost more to refine, or you get less valuable products. Sulfur content lowers price as it cost more to remove and you get a little less petroleum for increasing amounts of sulfur per barrel.

When prices were higher, the deltas between high quality to low quality oil were also higher.

Look at the following link, then change the period from recent months to recent years and look at the delta back in 2008.

Landed Costs of Imported Crude by API Gravity
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_land3_k_m.htm


11 posted on 02/02/2010 9:02:49 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

A little dated but probably still relevant.

http://www.neb-one.gc.ca/clf-nsi/rnrgynfmtn/nrgyrprt/lsnd/lsnd-eng.html

What are the operating costs and the supply costs of producing a barrel of oil from the oil sands?

The estimated operating costs range from $6 to $14 per barrel for bitumen and $18 to $22 per barrel for synthetic crude oil. The estimated supply costs ranges from $14 to $24 per barrel for bitumen and from $36 to $40 per barrel for synthetic crude oil. Supply costs include operating costs, capital costs, taxes, royalties and the rate of return on investment.

Note operating cost are after the huge capital investment. I think supply cost includes both, but does not include taxes and royalties, I think.


12 posted on 02/02/2010 9:41:31 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The joke is on them — we’ll be too stone broke to buy foreign oil if Comrade Obama has his way.


13 posted on 02/02/2010 11:31:10 AM PST by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson