Posted on 02/01/2010 5:48:09 PM PST by freespirited
James O'Keefe, accused of trying to tamper with the phones of Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu, was "framed" by the media and the U.S. attorney's office, Andrew Breitbart, publisher of BigGovernment.com, told Fox News Monday.
The same day the man who first published James O'Keefe's explosive videos exposing wrongdoing at community organizer ACORN came to his defense Monday, claiming the conservative filmmaker "sat in jail for 28 hours without access to an attorney" while the prosecutor made his case to the media, the U.S. attorney involved stepped down.
O'Keefe, accused of trying to tamper with the phones of Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu, was "framed" by the media and the U.S. attorney's office, Andrew Breitbart, publisher of BigGovernment.com, told Fox News Monday.
Hours later, Jim Letten, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Louisiana, recused himself from the case.
The Department of Justice announced the change in a news release Monday night, but did not say why Letten wanted off the case.
"James O'Keefe sat in jail for 28 hours without access to an attorney, while the U.S. attorney leaked the information about his arrest, helping the media frame it as 'Watergate Junior,'" Breitbart said.
"The panty bomber on Christmas was given -- you know, this guy's from Al Qaeda, and he's not even an American citizen, and he's given access to an attorney right away. I believe that this was a concerted effort, this is just my opinion, to allow for the media to frame the issue to put James O'Keefe in a very bad position."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Time for Breitbart, IMHO, to come out with the info he said he had. (when he challenged Holder to investigate)
Jim Letten was named to an ADVISORY PANEL for Eric HOLDER??? Double OMG!! Holder is DANGEROUS to AMERICAN FREEDOM!!
Obama knows who his real enemies are, and he respects his friends.
I don't know why he recused himself.
Has he been on yet?
Can you provide a summary for the cable deprived?
From the link I posted above (and keep in mind that David Vitter has one of the most conservative voting records):
Attorney General Eric Holder today appointed Jim Letten, the New Orleans area's top federal prosecutor, to a key advisory board -- an action that Sen. David Vitter says show Letten's job is safe and enough for him to drop his holds on some of President Barack Obama's Louisiana criminal justice nominees.Would you rather have a loony socialist in the position, or a good solid conservative?"This prestigious appointment makes it crystal clear that Jim isn't going anywhere except on regular trips to Washington to personally advise the attorney general," Vitter, R-La., said. "The attorney general and I superficially discussed this in our meeting last Thursday and I'm really excited to get it done."
Vitter said he now plans to sign the blue slips for Obama's criminal justice nominees. The slips are required from the senators in the home states of prosecutors, judges and U.S. marshals before the Senate Judiciary Committee will schedule confirmation hearings.
Letten is being appointed to the Attorney General's Advisory Committee of U.S. Attorneys. The panel, consisting of selected U.S. attorneys, provides advice and counsel to the attorney general on policy, management and operational issues impacting federal prosecutors. The panel was formed in 1973.
...
Jim Letten sounds like the NIFONG!!!(in the Duke Rape case)
VERY CONFUSING!!! Letten CANNOT be CLEAN if HOLDER has picked him to be on his Advisory Board!! Letten MUST be DIRTY...so what’s with Vitter...are they FRIENDS???
As the article said, Vitter forced Holder's hand by keeping "holds" on some of Obama's criminal justice appointees in order to make sure that Letten would be retained. I encourage you to go read for a while about what a phenomenal prosecutor Letten has been - easily the best this area has ever had since I've been alive.
That sounds like a promotion to me.
Sorry...maybe “clean” for Louisiana, but Holder is as DIRTY as can be and would NEVER PICK SOMEONE CLEAN to be on his Advisory Board...NEVER! DIRTY only deals with DIRTY.
Here! Here! Stand up man. The only law and order we have here sometimes.
Letten’s office is now prosecuting four young men who are accused of entering Landrieu’s New Orleans office last Monday for the purpose of committing a felony. One is the son of the acting U.S. attorney in Shreveport.
I just read an article that quotes from Letten’s request. He refers to the “potential prosecution” of the four.
Interesting choice of words. I am not sure this is going anywhere, although no shortage of taxpayer $$ will be spent on the “investigation.”
There really would not have been any reason to keep O'K away from a lawyer for 28 hours unless the media, Landrieu and the LE ( FBI, USatty and Holder) were massaging the story. Then all media hell breaks loose.
This absolutely stinks. If Letten is the good guy here, he's going to get thrown under the bus, and he ought to take a few crooks with him. If he's the bad guy, he'll also get thrown under the bus.
> OMG!! We ARE living in a BANANA REPUBLIC!!!
The fact that Letten recused himself from the case shows that
he and the Feds do not want to be associated with how people
are jailed in Louisiana. If Letten persisted, I’d agree with
the banana republic assessment.
Going 28 hours without an access to an attorney & leaking facts
of the case will not only get O’Keefe off scott free (not that it
appears he was doing anything illegal per se), but will also
give him ammo to sue the govt because his civil rights were
violated, as he was treated as a political enemy of the Obama
Administration.
BAM, you’re right.
A promotion to shut Letten up, so he doesn’t tell who was really
behind the decision to hold O’Keefe for 28 hrs without access
to counsel.
"The panty bomber on Christmas was given -- you know, this guy's from Al Qaeda, and he's not even an American citizen, and he's given access to an attorney right away.
Liberal thugs giving more care to terrorists? Not surprised... not anymore.
Perhaps. Holder certainly isn’t deserving of trust.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.