Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott Brown records robocall for John McCain re-election bid
http://www.bostonherald.com ^ | January 29, 2010 | Boston Herald

Posted on 02/01/2010 10:45:51 AM PST by Maelstorm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: stephenjohnbanker

WTF is this? You can bet that if it had been ME that was banned, I wouldn’t be resurrected on FR until Jesus comes back!


61 posted on 02/02/2010 5:33:39 AM PST by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback; AuntB; Maelstorm
If people think that a guy who’s been expressing conservative values on this site since 1999 is suddenly a troll because he isn’t hailing Hayworth as the new Messiah, that’s groupthink.

It's characteristic of groupthink to lump people together without specific evidence indicating such.

I'm opposed to McCain. I have investigated independently the charges Maelstorm leveled against Hayworth and found them wanting. He has been spamming them all over the forum even after being confronted with evidence to the contrary. Hence, my opinion is that he's trolling for those who have not and will not investigate the charges to predispose them against a viable alternative to McCain. I don't care how long he's been here; that is what the behavior resembles. The charge had NOTHING to do with what I think of Hayworth and only with this series of posts on Maelstorm's part. So, I did have specific evidence and multiple personal observations in support of the epithet.

You did not.

What is more disturbing is that you, also a long term FReeper, needed to construct a subjective definition of "groupthink" to reinforce the accusation. Brainwashed leftists behave that way; conservatives usually do not (unless the issue is abortion, where we too often allow ourselves to be herded into unproductive positions like stupid sheep). So instead of pissing on something that isn't what you think it was, why don't you tell us what your problem with Hayworth really is?

Personally, I think Hayworth is a professional demagogue with little real world background. He got used and did his best to fix it and it cost him a cool half million bucks to do so. So IMO, he does have his heart in as right a place as he can figure. He has name recognition and established communications skills. However, he could be just as bad as that intemperate backstabbing thug McCain and I would STILL support him, just to teach creeps in the Senate (like Lindsay Graham) a lesson. Our situation is so precarious. I have seen nothing to indicate that Hayworth would be anything but an improvement over that creep, especially as regards border enforcement which I see as one of many life and death issues for this nation. We have limited choices of viable alternatives among Senate candidates in Arizona. Re-electing McCain is not an option.

So, how is that "groupthink"? It certainly isn't thinking of him as some sort of savior (and the simile on your part is offensive).

If Maelstorm keeps relentlessly spamming the same flimsy stuff all over the forum to the benefit of McCain, I'll call that behavior what it appears to be to me. Deal with it.

62 posted on 02/02/2010 7:26:37 AM PST by Carry_Okie (They were the Slave Party then; they are the Slave Party now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; stephenjohnbanker; mkjessup; Maelstrom; Jim Robinson

Great post, Carry_Okie.

Now, I’ll make this short. Last night I got an email from Maelstrom. I will answer here, since there is NO need to email me to my personal email address, this is forum discussion. He had much to say, but this was the bottom line:

“Either way I hope you will put in a good word for me with Jim. I promise I won’t post negative stuff about JD anymore to stir the pot. I hope that is enough.”

Maelstrom, I don’t want you or anyone else ‘banned’. I just want the repeated false accusations stopped. In 12 years on this forum, I’ve never tried to get anyone banned. It’s Jim’s house, his business who he bans. I’ve often wondered why he hasn’t banned me!

If you have relevant “negative stuff about JD”, it should be posted. As with McCain, or ANY candidate, we need to know the facts. But what you were continually posting was was proven wrong, was neither relevant or truthful except for your statement that you were ‘stirring the pot’. That is the problem. I’m sorry you don’t seem to understand that. Hopefully we can get on with it, because this old country is running out of time!


63 posted on 02/02/2010 8:02:58 AM PST by AuntB (If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Well stated.


64 posted on 02/02/2010 8:09:37 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Geez AuntB, ‘Strom, ‘Storm, whatever-his-name is (or was), he gets banned to outer Slobovia, and then he comes scratchin’ at your door and ya gave him a blanket, put the mangy mutt in front of the fire, and served him up some Milk Bone biscuits, and put in a good word for him!

(sigh) Well if he’s not going to post those lies about Hayworth, that’s all that matters anyway, just like you said.

And you’re right it isn’t about ‘stirring the pot’, it’s about posting TRUTHFUL and ACCURATE information. The garbage ‘Strom or ‘Storm (whatever) was posting was nothing but lies and he was called on it *multiple* times and yet persisted in posting the lies in true DU-like fashion.

That dog (the ‘stirring the pot’ gambit) won’t hunt.


65 posted on 02/02/2010 8:12:45 AM PST by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: AuntB; Maelstrom

Free Republic is a pro-God, pro-Life, pro-family, pro-Liberty, pro-America, pro-constitution, pro-limited government, pro-defense, pro-borders conservative site. I’ve posted it a thousand times.

We are not a free speech chatroom and definitely not a liberal debating society. We are conservative activists with certain pro-Liberty conservative goals in mind. Liberals, RINOS or people who are actively working against our stated conservative goals are unwelcome trolls.

Those working against our conservative candidates or causes and or FOR the domestic enemy are unwelcome trolls. You’re either with us or against us.

In this case, McCain IS the domestic enemy. I want him out of there and I take it seriously enough to ban serial trolls even if they’ve been here for ten years or more!!

By the time these next two election cycles are over, we will either be successful or FR will be a ghost town. I’m going for broke. Our Liberty and our right to exist as a free nation is at stake.

OUT with the socialists AND the RINOS!!

Hope this helps.


66 posted on 02/02/2010 8:28:18 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Join the TEA Party Rebellion!! Just vote them OUT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: AuntB; Maelstorm
For the record, I did not file abuse charges or make any other complaint about Maelstorm's post. I simply wanted him to stop repeating this disinformation about Hayworth and Abramoff.

In 12 years on this forum, I’ve never tried to get anyone banned.

I did, with FairOpinion, 68grunt, et al. THOSE bans were richly deserved. Fools I can handle; serial propaganda artists who repeatedly fill the sidebar with BS posts, and then clog the forum, cheer-leading a 24-7 Tar Baby claque of spammers and disinformation artists, and then run when confronted later in the thread, are too destructive to tolerate in a place dedicated specifically to developing, exchanging, refining, and promulgating conservative ideas. Those people were wantonly destructive to the purpose of this forum. There are so many other places they can sell their bilge, that it is not a free speech issue.

67 posted on 02/02/2010 8:30:29 AM PST by Carry_Okie (They were the Slave Party then; they are the Slave Party now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
By the time these next two election cycles are over, we will either be successful or FR will be a ghost town.

As long as there are two FReepers left standing it won't be a ghost town. Dam the torpedoes... FR will never die.

68 posted on 02/02/2010 10:34:23 AM PST by McGruff (Love ya Sarah but I will support and contribute to JD Hayworth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson