[rxsid]

"I am not going down this road...you go find the statute that said it was legal...

I have done THOROUGH research on this...it wasn’t legal.

as I said...I am done jumping through hoops showing you people the law...go find it or believe what you want.."

Sure.

Until court order discovery proves otherwise, I'll stick with the court ordered divorced of what the state of HI believed was a legal marriage in their state. Oh, and not to mention his campaign web site that admitted he was under the "jurisdiction" of the 1948 BNA.

Let there be discovery!

[RummyChick]

Yeah sure..and be sure to tell immigration in UK (and for that matter the US) that they must let in anyone who lies to get married under false pretenses and doesn’t tell the truth in divorce court...

sheesh...

[Seizethecarp]

"Oh, and not to mention his campaign web site that admitted he was under the "jurisdiction" of the 1948 BNA." The statement was that BHO Sr.'s _children_ were under the 1948 BNA, certainly implying that BHO II was under it. But if you actually read the 1948 BNA, it only applies to legitimate children, not to illegitimate children such as children of bigamous marriages.

Under the Kenya Marriage Act of 1902, which seems to have applied to colonial Kenya in 1956 or thereabouts when BHO Sr married Ketzia, polygamy was not allowed specifically including Muslims and tribally married persons.