To: reasonisfaith
It makes no sense to me. I served 5 years in Saudi Arabia including during the entire Gulf War. I also served two years in Iran during the fall of the Shah and the rise of Khomeini. Obama does not need Bush 41 to be an intermediary with Israel. Bush's real value is with his long time relationship with the rulers of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Plus Bush was President during the Gulf War. He knows the region.
Bush and Baker were able to convince Israel to stay out of the war even after they were attacked with Scuds. The US must now convince Israel that it will be protected from Iran and that the US will do something about Iran's development of nuclear weapons. The show of force is part of that commitment.
151 posted on
01/31/2010 8:26:11 PM PST by
kabar
To: kabar
Then Maybe Bush was at the WH representing his friends concerns
158 posted on
01/31/2010 8:31:07 PM PST by
JustPiper
(WHERE is the "Progress" in PROGRESSIVE?)
To: kabar
Your exactly right on Bush Sr.s involvement....you can bet there are many officials in this country aware of these happenings but they will always keep it from the press as long as possible....Americans on the whole are squimmish . too many who want to play nice-y nice-y
160 posted on
01/31/2010 8:32:36 PM PST by
caww
To: kabar
Bush and Baker were able to convince Israel to stay out of the war even after they were attacked with Scuds.
And who in the Obama adminstration has the same type of relationship with Israel?
To: kabar
Thank you for your service and for your informative posts here.
And what are the chances that this turns out to just be some saber rattling?
224 posted on
01/31/2010 9:20:21 PM PST by
Canedawg
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson