Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Angry voters track RINOs and incumbents
Renew America ^ | 1-31-2010 | Henry Lamb

Posted on 01/31/2010 2:49:24 PM PST by smoothsailing

January 31, 2010

Angry voters track RINOs and incumbents



By Henry Lamb

Barack Obama told reporters that he rode the same wave of public anger into office that brought Scott Brown into Ted Kennedy's Senate seat. Not quite. The wave of public anger that elected Scott Brown is focused on Barack Obama and the Congressional Democrats who are pushing his policies.

The public anger is more than justified. Both the President and Congress have turned a deaf ear to the expressed will of the people throughout the first year of the new administration. Even after the candidates Obama endorsed and campaigned for in Virginia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts all lost convincingly, Democrat strategists are advising the leadership to "show character" by fighting even harder to impose government-controlled health care.

They would, were it not for the inconvenient fact that every Representative and 33 Senators must face the "angry public" at the polls this year.

All across the country, local, state, and national organizations are preparing to choose a new future for America. The future America wants is controlled by neither Democrats nor Republicans, but by elected officials who honor their pledge to "...preserve, protect, and defend" the U.S. Constitution.

Instead of its eleventh annual national conference this year, one national grassroots organization is scheduling regional, state, and local conferences around the country, focusing on ways to elect only those representatives who will publicly sign a pledge that includes ideas such as these:

These are basic Constitutional principles that the federal government has forgotten over the years. The current leadership routinely ignores the limitation of power imposed upon Congress by the Constitution. This is the source of much of the public anger that has become so visible.

Another national organization is organizing from the precinct level on up through the state party machinery. Their goal is essentially to take over the Republican Party by replacing RINO party official at the lower levels in order to send delegates to the state level who will oust RINO state officials. This strategy has worked quite well in Nevada and is currently being implemented in several other states.

These activities reflect the growth of last year's Tea Party movement. This year, in addition to planning a variety of public events, Tea Party activists are getting involved in local and state organizations that are working behind the scenes to elect a new crop of officials at every level of government.

Congressional incumbents are vulnerable, especially those who voted for the so-called stimulus bill, or the Cap-and-Trade bill, or the notorious health care bills. These bills blatantly ignore the Constitutional limitation of Congressional power and would go a long way toward fundamentally transforming the country into what would look like a socialist state.

Under socialist rule, the government decides how much payment an individual will receive for his labor, and what services the individual will receive from the government. Should Obama's agenda be enacted, the taxes required would, in effect, dictate how much payment an individual would be allowed to keep, while the government takes whatever portion it needs. The government would dictate how much energy a consumer might use, and the level of quality and quantity of health care a person might receive.

The vast majority of Americans want no part of socialist government control. The Tea Party movement is evidence of their resistance. Their organization into action groups is evidence of their strategy and their voting record in Virginia, New Jersey, and now in Massachusetts, is evidence of their effectiveness.

It's too late for the Democratic leadership to say "excuse me," and back up and pretend to be concerned about what the people want. They have already shown their true color and their true agenda. Americans who are grounded in the U.S. Constitution will have no part of it. The rebellion that began last year is mounting, getting better organized, and is taking aim at the November elections.

The November election, at best, is just a start at restoring the principles of freedom in the federal government. The campaign must continue through 2012, and beyond. Americans must never forget: freedom is not a destination; it is a hard, never-ending journey.

© Henry Lamb



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: angrymob; constitution; elections; henrylamb; teaparty; teapartyrebellion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 01/31/2010 2:49:24 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
From an e-mail today: From a Florida ER doctor  Having spent three weeks in a hospital in Naples, Florida with my wife I couldn’t help noticing what was going on in the hospital and I had a lot of time to talk to the doctors and nurses about what I had observed. Below is a commentary from an ER Doctor. Do you think this might be a big reason our health care system and our social security system are so screwed up? Do you think this might be a big reason our taxes keep going up? Who do you think these people are going to vote for? From a Florida ER doctor: "I live and work in a state overrun with illegals. They make more money having kids than we earn working full-time. Today I had a 25-year old with 8 kids - that’s right 8; all illegal anchor babies and she had the nicest nails, cell phone, hand bag, clothing, etc. She makes about $1,500 monthly for each; you do the math. I used to say, “We are the dumbest nation on earth.” Now I must say and sadly admit: WE are the dumbest people on earth (that includes ME) for we elected the idiot idealogues who have passed the bills that allow this. Sorry, but we need a revolution. Vote them all out in 2010. " --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 posted on 01/31/2010 2:51:26 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I pray this is true. I will be there to pull the level HARD!


3 posted on 01/31/2010 2:53:52 PM PST by my small voice (A biased media and an uneducated public is the biggest threat to our democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danamco

My sister works in the Post Office. She tells me of these welfare Queens with 10 or 12 kids getting 60k a year. They do not work and have kids with several different men all unmarried. As soon as the females are old enough to bear children they get them pregnant and get even more money. All on our dime. IT SUCKS!


4 posted on 01/31/2010 3:01:40 PM PST by screaminsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: danamco

>>Sorry, but we need a revolution. Vote them all out in 2010.”<<

.
A total crew change in congress can only be an improvement.


5 posted on 01/31/2010 3:02:55 PM PST by 353FMG (Save the Planet -- Eliminate Socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

I’m confused. Should I vote for a former congressman who has a long history of those listed ideals or should I say screw him and consider him an incumbent and let the marxist win?


6 posted on 01/31/2010 3:08:46 PM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: danamco

“8 kids - that’s right 8; all illegal anchor babies and she had the nicest nails, cell phone, hand bag, clothing, etc. “She makes about $1,500 monthly for each”

Send her to Idaho, where she’ll get for 8 kids, let me see, carry the seven, oh, yes: nothing.


7 posted on 01/31/2010 3:13:56 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

That happened in my state in 2006. I was depressed for months, not likely to ever forget it.


8 posted on 01/31/2010 3:25:35 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BARLF

Fortunately my former congressman is leading the early polls by around 10 points and has picked up the endorsements of a couple of our current congressmen.

He wouldn’t be a former congressman if the NRCC hadn’t stripped him of funding two weeks before the last election. They called him a lost cause and he lost by a whopping 2% in this traditionally republican district.


9 posted on 01/31/2010 3:29:15 PM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

War on ALL Dems and RINO’s. Kick them ALL out of office! Phoney Blue Dogs included!


10 posted on 01/31/2010 3:33:24 PM PST by tflabo (Restore the Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danamco
This can be stopped. Make those Queens name the father before they can get welfare. If they won't name the animal, they WILL not get any help.

It is time we put a stop to this and the above solution is the only one that will do it. Those TOM cats are out every night dropping their seed.

CAll it the "Name the Papa" bill, make them pay or go to jail.

11 posted on 01/31/2010 3:48:26 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Great post...I have a request:

Do we have a website (conservative, of course), that has a link to a table that was built with the latest primary and general election tracking and opinion poll tracking all in one place or all in one table?

We have a guy who tracks Obama’s daily approval ratings, and perhaps we can put that in this handy dandy table as well...does it exist???


12 posted on 01/31/2010 3:53:14 PM PST by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tflabo; cripplecreek
A great sentiment, but we do have an identification problem. As cripplecreek suggests, an absolute rejection of all incumbents would just be a continuation of our already prolonged electoral stupidity. We need to properly tag the targets and take them out surgically. We want the patient to survive the operation.
13 posted on 01/31/2010 3:54:32 PM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Not “incumbents” per se, but those who are liberal and arrogant towards their constituents. Vitter, for example, is neither - although he’s an incumbent. He needs to be re-elected. He’s one of the most conservative Senators in Congress - and consistently so.


14 posted on 01/31/2010 3:57:00 PM PST by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Juan McAmnesty is #1 on the list. The rest will fall like dominoes and resign.


15 posted on 01/31/2010 4:15:55 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

Here’s a democrat turned RINO, turned independent that needs to be made into a trophy before he does any more damage. Democrats would likely vote for him because they don’t have a viable candidate for the governors chair this time around.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2441520/posts


16 posted on 01/31/2010 4:21:22 PM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: danamco

“She makes about $1,500 monthly for each”

This can’t be true. What are the facts here?


17 posted on 01/31/2010 5:13:55 PM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I’m confused. Should I vote for a former congressman who has a long history of those listed ideals or should I say screw him and consider him an incumbent and let the marxist win?

Support the best candidate between the two, incumbent, former, new guy ... whatever he is.

Just replacing people, however, will not fix the problem. The system is broken, and needs lots of repair. It is not in the best interest of incumbents (remember, after the new guy is elected, he becomes an incumbent) who want to get reelected to fix the system.

It is up to all of us to turn the heat up and keep it there.

18 posted on 01/31/2010 5:28:31 PM PST by RobinOfKingston (Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

Makes me wonder too!!!


19 posted on 01/31/2010 6:21:57 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; All

Vote in the PRIMARIES to get rid of RINOs.


20 posted on 01/31/2010 6:34:56 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson