Negating "Climategate": "..." Climate Science Survive Stolen E-Mail Controversy (Read Comments)

Scientific American ^ | Jan 29, 2010 | David Biello

[Southack]

SciAm has disgraced itself by glossing over the non-repeatable data of the East Anglia fraudsters.

In contrast, ice-core temperature data is repeatable. Drill more ice-holes and extract more ice cores to verify the temperature data that is buried within the ice.

But...that data confirms that the Earth’s climate changes naturally, and has been so doing long before Man was here, so it probably wouldn’t be a popular view among the SciAm staff.

[Southack]

Scientific American: How To Reform The IPCC: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=reform-the-intergovernmental-panel-on-climate-change&posted=1#comments

It appears as though IPCC credibility has suffered recently...