[DryFly]

And if you ask me, he should fry for premeditated murder.

[Hildy]

Of course. I can’t wait to see some of the idiot replies on this thread.

[sickoflibs]

I agree with you. See #3.

[Ol' Sparky]

And if you ask me, he should fry for premeditated murder.

All murderers should fry. But given that we usually only execute the most heinous of murderers, there is no reason why Roeder should be treated any differently than the average, run-of-the-mill murderer.

[Elpasser]

No. The first obligation of the state is to protect the life of its citizens.

Roeder’s action, while extreme, can be viewed as a rational response to rampant killing of human life that the state refused to halt.

[behzinlea]

Forfeited his own life to end the life of Tiller the baby killer.

There's a certain symmetry to it.

I mourn for the slaughtered innocent unborn, not for Tiller.

[DallasSun]

Absolutely he should.

[wardaddy]

no one asked you..lol