To: DryFly
No. The first obligation of the state is to protect the life of its citizens.
Roeder’s action, while extreme, can be viewed as a rational response to rampant killing of human life that the state refused to halt.
88 posted on
01/29/2010 11:20:54 AM PST by
Elpasser
To: Elpasser
If you believe that, then if you ask me, you are a whacko.
133 posted on
01/29/2010 11:55:05 AM PST by
DryFly
To: Elpasser
Roeders action, while extreme, can be viewed as a rational response to rampant killing of human life that the state refused to halt. Not if I'm on the jury it can't.
135 posted on
01/29/2010 11:55:46 AM PST by
Melas
To: Elpasser
Rational does not describe murder.
179 posted on
01/29/2010 12:38:20 PM PST by
twigs
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson