Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DryFly

No. The first obligation of the state is to protect the life of its citizens.

Roeder’s action, while extreme, can be viewed as a rational response to rampant killing of human life that the state refused to halt.


88 posted on 01/29/2010 11:20:54 AM PST by Elpasser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Elpasser

If you believe that, then if you ask me, you are a whacko.


133 posted on 01/29/2010 11:55:05 AM PST by DryFly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: Elpasser
Roeder’s action, while extreme, can be viewed as a rational response to rampant killing of human life that the state refused to halt. Not if I'm on the jury it can't.
135 posted on 01/29/2010 11:55:46 AM PST by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: Elpasser

Rational does not describe murder.


179 posted on 01/29/2010 12:38:20 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson