Contributions of Stratospheric Water Vapor to Decadal Changes in the Rate of Global WarmingStratospheric water vapor concentrations decreased by about 10% after the year 2000. Here, we show that this acted to slow the rate of increase in global surface temperature over 2000 to 2009 by about 25% compared to that which would have occurred due only to carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. More limited data suggest that stratospheric water vapor probably increased between 1980 and 2000, which would have enhanced the decadal rate of surface warming during the 1990s by about 30% compared to estimates neglecting this change. These findings show that stratospheric water vapor represents an important driver of decadal global surface climate change.
The cat's out of the bag, so now these mutts are hedging their bets?
1 posted on
01/28/2010 9:46:21 PM PST by
neverdem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: neverdem
I drink scotch & water...I pee.
I drink beer...I pee.
I drink wine...I pee.
So, every time I get all wee wee'd up, I am flattening out the climate change with my urinary output.
We is doomed I tells ya...doomed!
33 posted on
01/29/2010 2:00:20 AM PST by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus)
To: neverdem
I suppose HAARP has nothing to do with this.
/sar
36 posted on
01/29/2010 3:37:37 AM PST by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: neverdem
I’ve always thought the climate was self regulating, to a degree.
39 posted on
01/29/2010 4:28:57 AM PST by
CalvaryJohn
(What is keeping that damned asteroid?)
To: neverdem
Mystics peddling mysterious mysticism at the point of a gun.
42 posted on
01/29/2010 5:01:47 AM PST by
DocRock
(All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
To: neverdem
This is the new tactical warfare being implemented throughout the “global warming” community. Report on new things, but operate off of the basis that major warming has occurred, and most of it just recently: proven, water tight, impenetrable, beyond a doubt, overwhelming scientific evidence blah blah blah.
43 posted on
01/29/2010 5:19:31 AM PST by
carolinacrazy
(Bow to your sensei.... BOW TO YOUR SENSEI...... www.jackassdemocrats.com)
To: neverdem
CO2 is busted as a cause of heating so now they’re going for a loss of water vapor as the cause for cooling? Wrong, water vapor, like CO2, is a trailing indicator of temperature change. ISS (It’s the Sun Stupid).
44 posted on
01/29/2010 5:51:17 AM PST by
Justa
To: neverdem
Just make shit up as you go along. Good grief.
45 posted on
01/29/2010 5:56:51 AM PST by
TheZMan
(Just secede and get it over with. No love lost on either side. Cya.)
To: neverdem
Not only are they hedging their bets - they're setting up the next big lie freak out. Water - there's not going to be ANY WATER... We have to shut down the United States and all first world countries - WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE OF THIRST. God, I hate liberals.
51 posted on
01/29/2010 7:20:35 AM PST by
GOPJ
(Happy Anniversary Barack! - - - Love, Massachusetts - - - FreeperGOPsterinMA)
To: neverdem
54 posted on
01/29/2010 7:45:30 AM PST by
bmwcyle
(Free the Navy Seals)
To: neverdem
Notice how they scam the facts?
They say that there is an increase in “green house gases” but a decrease in global temperatures over the last decade.
when they know good and well that the “increase” in gases is because they just recently declared CO2 as a “Green house gas”, which would increase it by proxy and nothing more.
These people are so dishonest and corrupt! It merely reflects the Marxist mantra that it becomes a righteous cause to lie when the “End result justifies the means of the lie”.
To: neverdem
One of the things that I find so funny about this is that they keep talking through the article as if water vapor is not a "greenhouse gas". I can't wait for the drumbeats to eliminate dihydrogen monoxide. --It's for the children!
58 posted on
01/29/2010 11:34:54 AM PST by
zeugma
(Proofread a page a day: http://www.pgdp.net/)
To: neverdem
Maybe mother nature is able to largely protect herself.
65 posted on
02/02/2010 6:23:39 AM PST by
rwfromkansas
("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson