Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: American Constitutionalist

The Obamanation was much worse than rude, though, he chastised the SCOTUS in preposterous terms that would be unworthy of a college freshman

his ignorance of the actual decision and its implications is pitiful, but making it a national and international spectacle in the SOTU address is asinine

btw, now is a good time to demand that his own campaign funding be thoroughly investigated, that he open all records and allow full scrutiny of all those zillions of dollars in mysterious online donations which could and did come from all over the world


5 posted on 01/28/2010 12:24:25 AM PST by Enchante (Obama: how about some sunlight into all of YOUR illegal campaign donations? Release all records!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Enchante
his ignorance of the actual decision and its implications is pitiful, but making it a national and international spectacle in the SOTU address is asinine

Especially when the truth is so easy to find.

--------------------------------------------------

Tonight the president engaged in demogoguery of the worst kind, when he claimed that last week’s Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC, “open[ed] the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities.”

The president’s statement is false.

The Court held that 2 U.S.C. Section 441a, which prohibits all corporate political spending, is unconstitutional. Foreign nationals, specifically defined to include foreign corporations, are prohibiting from making “a contribution or donation of money or ather thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State or local election” under 2 U.S.C. Section 441e, which was not at issue in the case. Foreign corporations are also prohibited, under 2 U.S.C. 441e, from making any contribution or donation to any committee of any political party, and they prohibited from making any “expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication... .”

This is either blithering ignorance of the law, or demogoguery of the worst kind.

10 posted on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:31:03 PM by Freddd (CNN is not credible.)

10 posted on 01/28/2010 12:47:54 AM PST by TigersEye (It's the Marxism, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Enchante

...in addition he added his name to the list of idiot global warmers as if we didn’t have enough evidence of where he stood, when he announced he was on the side of “overwhelming scientific evidence”, and then slammed the Republicans by adding, “but even if you don’t believe the evidence”...

He spent a lot of arrogant time in the left hand teleprompter looking directly at the Republican side while doing his very best Benito act. I don’t know what it takes to get the attention of a Chicago community organizer, but apparently conservatives don’t, but them dems don’t either.


14 posted on 01/28/2010 1:28:23 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson