Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: USALiberty

“Not true” is, in all liklihood, correct. I would think that Alito knows what the opinion said, and what it did in legal terms. Will the liberals please allow Justice Alito the privilege of saying what he knows to be true? Or will they engage in their usual acts of censorship?


132 posted on 01/28/2010 7:10:03 AM PST by popdonnelly (Yes, we disagree - no, we won't shut up - no, we won't quit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All

There is protocol, as we were incessantly reminded last year about Cong. Wilson’s shout. Only this time it was **THE ONE** who broke protocol... And, gentlemen that he is, (not a street fighter like Joe Wilson), Justice Alito simlpy said, in response, the polite, “not true”. Prople forget that in the decision, that it specifically said that foreign contributions were not affected, and still not allowed, which **THE ONE** apparently does not understand. If he did he would have not mentioned that there would be foreign contributions... BTW, weren’t there some issues about foreign contributions **THE ONE** was supposed to have gotten in 2008, that were covered up? Inquiring minds want to know...


134 posted on 01/28/2010 7:18:37 AM PST by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson