Posted on 01/26/2010 2:17:50 PM PST by rabscuttle385
You really are an idiot, you think that Sarah Palin is the media queen, the most hated person in America by the media and the left, the one that is more viciously attacked than anyone that we have ever seen?
Throw that in with your "plagiarism" and "failed Governor" and you really are nuts.
Another lie on your part, you really are the troll that you have admitted to being.
Palin is arguably the top Republican possible candidate at this time depending on the poll, she is always in the top three, your list of troll lies is getting out of control and wasting FR energies.
Yep, by the Romney's, the Paul's, the Rudies, the left, the MSM(actually they like her now),SNL (they like her too now),Glenn Beck, O Reilly .... all proof she is ‘the one’. That's all we need right? Oh yes, she is another Reagan too!
You aren’t even making sense, I have no idea what you were trying to say.
I admire Sarah for many things but this decision to support McCain is stupid. It smacks of Bush and Santorum going to Pennsylvania to save Snarlin’ Arlen from getting his ass handed to him by a conservative.
HOW DID THAT WORK OUT AGAIN?
So Palin has not endorsed and will not stump for that liberal piece of excrement?
Correct sir! pick up your prize on your way out.
And your documented trolling in post 213 makes for a sorry tale, Bob (and I noticed you didn't address 213 at all - what a shock). You can hardly pretend you are being principled when you completely change your approach in such a short timeframe.
Once again, be a man and respect Jim's wishes that you leave FR if you are going to be such a two-faced weasel.
Yes
Nice work!
Thank you.
WOW!
:-)
to the Paulist:
“Palin is arguably the top Republican possible candidate at this time depending on the poll, she is always in the top three, your list of troll lies is getting out of control and wasting FR energies.”
I’m crashing on a project so won’t be able to be around for a few days, but the more these morons talk, the bigger chance they have to show they are nothing but spamming trolls....I’m predicting a sacrifice when one goes over the line eventually...i give it a week or two.
If McCain wins, he can help Palin with a presidential run.That's something along the line of saying the fox can help the hen prepare dinner.
And if Palins endorsement defuses this primary challenge, McCain will owe Palin big-time.There are those who think he already does owe her bigtime, for the chicken-livered manner in which he handled his staffers' grotesque assaults upon her, a manner which in my opinion absolved her of any obligation she may have felt to endorse him. Politics may not be beanbag but there are things a gentleman does not do or sanction against even his most cringe-inducing opponent . . . never mind against an ally, or a running mate.
I say again: Palin should have kept quiet about the Arizona senate race entirely. Her silence would have been damning to McCain while doing nothing foul to Hayworth. And it would not have blocked her or her people from offering Hayworth back channel support if she saw fit to offer. That's done all the time in politics.
I disagree with many of Mac’s positions, but I respect the person’s service.
Living here in San Diego where huge numbers of the POWs were based, I saw dozens in person just after they returned from Viet Nam. You don’t understand unless you see this inperson.
As far as service goes, there are some on this thread
who are anti war, believe the PaulBot propaganda that we deserved 9/11 because we are occupiers.
Having gone face to face with PaulBots and Code Pinkos
many times in person, they have the same talking points.
I disagree with his positions too. I am willing to accept that his service may have been honorable though. I have read enough to realize there are some issues pertaining to this period, but I cannot determine if they are sound and valid. The objections sound reasoned. Under normal circumstances, I would sign on to them. This is a very touchy issue. I’m always going to be inclined to side with the POW, but here I just don’t know.
Here’s what confounds me.
1. Why the intervention or behalf of Vietnam?
2. Why the deaf ear to MIA families and veterans?
3. Why the delirious comradery with Vietnamese officials?
My default position would he that MIA family sensitivities would trump. John’s default position was that Vietnamese interests would trump.
Not all that many years had passed and these same Vietnamese officials had been party to POW abuse and a massive purge.
None the less, John advocated for them over MIA families and veterans. sir never be able to forget what that says about McCain.
BTW, I’m using a tablet and it contributes to some confusing mistakes at times. I try to catch them, but I missed a couple.
In addition I’m not a Paulbot or an anti-war individual. Code Pink, A.N.S.W.E.R.,and their fellow travelers are vile.
There is no need to flame me. Read my post #362.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.