Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid

What HI produced tho was very incomplete. It did not even resemble a true long form birth certificate. Look at the lack of information on what Obama has posted. It’s truly pathetic. CO


12 posted on 01/25/2010 9:26:58 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Canadian Outrage
"What HI produced tho was very incomplete. It did not even resemble a true long form birth certificate. Look at the lack of information on what Obama has posted. It’s truly pathetic. CO

The world famous www jpeg for Barry is actually a modern day (rev 11/01) short form, and of course, of suspect authenticity.

If he obtained an original record back in 1961 by way of the 1957 law, that would look completely different.

20 posted on 01/26/2010 10:17:33 AM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Canadian Outrage
What HI produced tho was very incomplete. It did not even resemble a true long form birth certificate. Look at the lack of information on what Obama has posted. It’s truly pathetic.

*******

1. Aug. 4, 1961--- Obama supposedly born in Hawaii in Kapiolani hospital.

2. Aug. 5, 1961--- Nordyke twins born in Hawaii in same Kapiolani hospital. Copies of long form birth certificates are on internet.

3. Aug. 8, 1961--- Obama's birth certificate is filed with Hawaii vital statistics, if we are to believe what we see on Obama's short form birth certificate that we see all over the internet.

4. Aug. 11, 1961--- Nordyke twins birth certificate filed with Hawaii vital statistics.

5. 10641--- Obama number on short form birth certificate that we see all over the internet.

6. 10638--- Nordyke twin number on top of long form birth certificate.

7. 10637--- Nordyke twin number on top of long form birth certificate we see on internet.

8. Huh? What is going here that does NOT smell right? Why does Obama's certificate have a HIGHER number than the Nordyke twins' certificates, when the Obama certificate was filed 3 days EARLIER: Aug. 8 vs. Aug. 11.

9. I'm sorry but the following scenario concerning Hawaii clerk procedure is hard for me to believe:

A clerk at the Hawaii vital statistics department files Obama's birth certificate on Aug. 8, but waits until AFTER Aug. 11---the day the Nordyke twins birth certificates are filed---to give Obama's birth certificate a higher number than the Nordyke numbers of 10637 and 10638.

Obama's number is 10641, if we are to believe the filing date that we see on Obama's short form birth certificate that we see all over the internet.

10. It seems more reasonable to me that the clerk would give a birth certificate a filing NUMBER at the same time it gave it a filing DATE.

11. So, if Obama's birth certificate was filed on Aug. 8, then I would expect it to get a LOWER filing number than the Nordyke twins' birth certificates that were filed on Aug. 11.

12. But as we can see above, Obama's birth certificate received a HIGHER number---10641---than the Nordyke twins---10637 and 10638.

13. Something does not smell right concerning why Obama received a HIGHER number than the Nordyke twins received.

14. I wish that the Nordyke twins would demand that Hawaii officials explain why they received LOWER numbers than Obama. They obviously have so-called "standing" to ask questions about their own Hawaii birth certificates.

22 posted on 01/28/2010 3:32:44 AM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson