As you have stated previously “IMHO”...
worth what it costs, same as everybody.
By the way, the attorney does not have to have standing, just the client. IMO they all have standing, especially Alan Keyes...now why does the court disagree? They have never explained, just made the pronouncement.
According to the definition of “Standing”, at the very least, Alan Keyes has standing....
IYO do you care to enlighten us all?
Duh. When you had asked why I wasn't filing any suits I assumed you meant on my own behalf. But Orly doesn't seem to be having any luck finding clients with standing to sue either.
IMO they all have standing, especially Alan Keyes...now why does the court disagree?
Maybe the judges don't have your creative imagination? Why do you think they all have standing to sue?
They have never explained, just made the pronouncement.
Read the decisions. The judges lay out their reasons there.
According to the definition of “Standing”, at the very least, Alan Keyes has standing....
I'm familiar with the definition of standing. Why do you think Keyes qualifies?