Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion; Kenny Bunk
"One thing though. The dual citizenship claim hinges on Obama being the son of Barack Obama Sr. I understand Leo saying we need to go by what Obama has publicly claimed, but for purposes of law the official records are what we have to go by. "

There is an official record that exists already. The 1964 divorce record states that Stanley Ann D. Obama and Barack H. Obama "were lawfully married in Wailuku, Maui, State of Hawaii, on February 2, 1961, by a person duly authorized to perform marriage cerimonies and ever since that date have been and are now husband and wife."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18130289/Obama-1964-Divorce-Papers-13-Pages-Missing-Pg-11

68 posted on 01/28/2010 10:15:44 AM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: rxsid; butterdezillion
Like everything else in the strange appearance of one Barack Hussein 0bama, Jr. amongst us, even this is something we are looking at in Alice-in-Wonderland's Magic Mirror.

There is the Divorce Decree, with no evidence of a Marriage License. We simply do not know if Stanley Ann Dunham, and the already married father, BHO, Sr., went through any sort of ceremony. No witnesses have come forward. Wailuku, Maui? It is the county seat and has a courthouse full of records ... except for this one.

BHO, Sr. could well be BHO, Jr.'s answer to the mysterious Blythe, the convenient dead guy who was in the Army in Europe until three months before Bill Clinton's birth, and who was also already married with children in Texas. Bill's Uncle Ray handled that one.

70 posted on 01/28/2010 10:33:35 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (Go-Go Donofrio. get us that Writ of Quo Warranto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

True, and good point. I wonder if “natural born citizen” relies on the citizenship status of the birth father and mother, or the father and mother who raise the child, or what.

Again, there are many reasons that the SCOTUS should clarify the term “natural born”.


74 posted on 01/28/2010 10:58:29 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson