I think Nancy and Barney would like to go Kamikaze.
The Kamikazes failed in 1944-45 and these liberal kamikazes will fail as well.
Yes, yes, I agree. Their only hope now is to push even harder to the left.
I learned something new today - the Nazis actually had Kamikazes. There was a Luftwaffengruppe dedicated to hitting US bombers right at the end of the war.
I never knew that.
Nanzi Pelosi goes commando.
Just try and get that picture out of your head,
I dare you.
“I think Nancy and Barney would like to go Kamikaze.”
Not a chance, maybe Barney and Harry. Bawney doesn’t like womyn.
Obamakazi’s ready for take off!
What?!
They've bankrupted the country.
How much more liberal can you get?
We are fools to let the Democrats believe otherwise.
Yeah. If they're willing to wage a war.
| To defeat a socialist/communist, you must understand how they think and why they go Kamikaze. Please read on. Fabien Socialists believe in incremental, non-violent change to bring in their new order. For the most part, Obama with his New Party roots falls into this category, aiming to stoke the flames of discontent upon millions of their devout followers. The Revolutionary Communist Party believes in using violence as the means to come to the same conclusion. Van Jones, groups like the Black Panthers, and even violent right-wing groups feed into — and are meant to be tools of — this philosophy. The Fabien Socialists and their offshoots have been conducting their incremental change in American society trough the courts, pop culture and other arenas for nearly a century. On the other hand, the Revolutionary Communist Party has been patiently waiting to execute their plans when the opportunity avails itself. They thought the race riots in the 1960s and 1992 (in LA) would have pushed America to the edge and were ready to pounce if the situation would have continued, but relative economic stability contained those flare ups. If you read their blogs, forums and newsletters, you'll see that the violent revolutionaries of the Revolutionary Communist Party and other offshoots think that with the current faltering US economy, and the dependency of a large class of people on that economy, the time is now. They'll attempt to use social unrest from the Left (and the reactionary response from the Right) to cause change in our form of government. That's what Obama's sudden "populist" push against the banks is all about — to channel disaffected people and their anger against the Capitalist system, to force the banks under tight government control, despite the fact many have repaid their TARP loans. When Obama announces he's suddenly for a "Discretionary-Spending Freeze," he means to bring about social change by squeezing tens of millions of people dependent upon the government to rise up against Capitalism. It'll look like he's "seen the light," but he's simply reversing the train to get to the same destination — Social Change. Mark my words — THIS is where Obama is going now that he sees Congress no longer has his back with votes on ObamaCare. When Pelosi and others seem to be acting Kamikaze, understand it's because the TRUE BELIEVERS are pushing their political leaders to the brink. They will attempt desperate, if not irrational, means to accomplish their goals. They want collapse and anarchy so Obama and others in government can hit the “reset button” on our Constitution by introducing laws and/or Executive Orders meant to place Capitalist entities under government control. They are TRUE BELIEVERS of their fanaticism, and they control the White House and critical parts of Congress. Be very wary in this situation, as these radicals intend to incite violence from both the Left and the Right to get to that Tipping Point in their process. OUR predecessors in this on-going fight called it The Red Scare in the 1920s and 1950s for a reason. I leave you with a quote to ponder:
I began revolution with 82 men. If I had to do it again, I'd do it with 10 or 15 and absolute faith. It does not matter how small you are if you have faith and plan of action. ~ Fidel Castro Keep your powder dry. |
If you try a strategy to achieve a goal and you fail, the normal person will go back to the drawing board, conceive a new strategy and try it.
When liberals fail to achieve a goal, they grab their family, slit their throats and jump off a cliff with the pet poodle. Liberals are indeed crazy. They’re devolving back into primordial soup.
I'd pay to see that..
...the reason Massachusetts voters rejected Martha Coakley -- aside from her personal failings as a candidate - is that Democrats in Washington failed to pursue a sufficiently liberal agenda. As Sen. John Kerry and the other leaders of the Massachusetts Democratic Party were still standing on stage, jaws slack and eyes vacant, commentators Chris Matthews and Rachel Maddow on MSNBC said that the vote was proof that President Obama and his team had to act urgently to jam his health care bill through Congress by any parliamentary means necessary. Maddow, astonishingly, said it had to be done in 30 days. Over at the Boston Globe... editorial writers pretended that Republican Scott Brown's election had been a certainty for some time... If you relied only on the Globe for your news, the last poll you read about before Election Day was the one from Jan. 6 from the paper and the University of New Hampshire that showed Coakley winning in a 17-point walk over Republican Scott Brown.Thanks TigerLikesRooster.
0bamakazis - Barry’s vision of his loyal Democrat party members.
Dear libs: keep thinking this way.