Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama slays Repubs in Fox News poll
Wash Examiner ^ | 1/21/10 | Julie Mason

Posted on 01/21/2010 10:07:18 PM PST by pissant

A new Fox News poll has President Obama losing in 2012 to a generic Republican candidate -- but mostly stomping a few big-name Republicans. Which leads one to wonder -- who is this generic Republican who could beat him?

According to the poll, Obama beats Mitt Romney, 47 percent to 35 percent, defeats Sarah Palin, 55 percent to 31 percent, and makes a quick business of Newt Gingrich, 53 percent to 29 percent. What, no Santorum?

Generically, Obama loses to an unnamed Republican, 43 percent to 47 percent.

Further: 43 percent of Americans say they would vote to re-elect Barack Obama if the 2012 election were held today, which is unchanged from October, yet is down from 52 percent who said they would re-elect him in April.

All in all, 47 percent of Americans say they would vote for someone else rather than re-electing President Obama, up from 31 percent in April.

Moreover, the number saying they would "definitely" vote to re-elect Obama has declined -- going from 37 percent in April to 26 percent in October to 23 percent in the new poll.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Obama-slays-Repubs-in-Fox-News-poll-82312997.html#ixzz0dJoeAgRY

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 2010polls; 2012gopprimary; bho2012; larrysinclairslover; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: Onerom99

If so, it would be because of Obama chinslurps like you.


41 posted on 01/21/2010 10:53:31 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

He needs to win some office first. But he has a great future.


42 posted on 01/21/2010 10:53:57 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Onerom99

You couldn’t name a conservative, much less 500, chinslurp


43 posted on 01/21/2010 10:54:56 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pissant

This poll is meaningless if it was taken before the Brown Out in Mass...


44 posted on 01/21/2010 10:57:09 PM PST by tubebender (Freeploaders = The illegal aliens on Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norge

I just saw something about unemployment benefits—applications shooting up in January, massively—and as always, “unexpectedly.”


45 posted on 01/21/2010 10:59:03 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Starting in January ‘11, if the GOP really regains a majority in either chamber of Congress or really regains a majority in both chambers of Congress, then Obama will also not be as powerful. A true, super-majority of actual conservatives in the next Congress would really make Obama very powerless. What would Obama DEFINITELY DO next in such political circumstances?


46 posted on 01/21/2010 10:59:10 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Jack the Ripper has my vote! I take him to be a fairly conservative guy.


47 posted on 01/21/2010 11:00:02 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
I think you're missing the point about Brown. It's not that Scott Brown should be the nominee but that someone like Brown should be the nominee. A nice looking guy (unlike Newt) who is articulate (unlike Palin) and is someone that most people can relate to and 'real' (unlike Romney).
48 posted on 01/21/2010 11:04:42 PM PST by ari-freedom (Obamacare: nananana nananana hey hey hey goodbye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I think he was referring only to whether abortion should remain “legal.” He’s pro-choice-to-kill. But he’s against Birth-Canal Brain-Suctioning (that’s the clinical, non-emotional term for “Partial-Birth Abortion”) and Embryonic Stem Cell Research, strangely enough.

I can stomach a Protestant who’s so-so on abortion ahead of a loathsome, vile, Satan-worshipping, phony, pro-abortion “Catholic” any day. E.g., Kennedy, Kerry, Coakley, etc.


49 posted on 01/21/2010 11:04:53 PM PST by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

I believe the Jan unemployment numbers will be horrific.


50 posted on 01/21/2010 11:06:16 PM PST by norge (The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
"What would Obama DEFINITELY DO next in such political circumstances?"

many freepers and tea party activists worry about what Obama will do. I worry most about what he will not do: anything that will prevent Iran from having a nuclear bomb.
51 posted on 01/21/2010 11:09:04 PM PST by ari-freedom (Obamacare: nananana nananana hey hey hey goodbye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Should we be surprised? Romney is a fag. Sarah isn’t near ready (2016 perhaps), and Gingrich is a lech and a RINO. Try Scott Brown for kicks.


52 posted on 01/21/2010 11:10:21 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
Conservative, No. Libertarian, possibly!
53 posted on 01/21/2010 11:10:41 PM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

DeMint/Bolton


54 posted on 01/21/2010 11:12:03 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Pat Caddell: Democrats are drinking kool-aid in a political Jonestown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: norge
I believe the Jan unemployment numbers will be horrific.

I believe you are right about that. Ubama really screwed the pooch with his gambit of encouraging the economy go to pot in order to incite a clamor by down-on-their-luck unemployed for "free" health care.

56 posted on 01/21/2010 11:14:46 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: pissant
. . .who is this generic Republican who could beat him?

Fred Thompson? Michelle Bachmann? Paul Ryan?

If we pray fervently, he/she will become known. We have time.

57 posted on 01/21/2010 11:15:04 PM PST by MSSC6644 (Defeat Satan. Pray the Rosary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
"Just think, if Mitt moves to California, we could have Romney/Brown in 2012."

Yes, AND Monkeys could depart form my nether regions also...

58 posted on 01/21/2010 11:15:14 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Another excellent combination.


59 posted on 01/21/2010 11:15:17 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

“But he’s against Birth-Canal Brain-Suctioning (that’s the clinical, non-emotional term for “Partial-Birth Abortion”) and Embryonic Stem Cell Research, strangely enough.”

it’s not so strange...he seems to be in favor of other things to limit abortion without touching the Roe hot potato. It may be his strategy to get in all these other restrictions in but since he supports Roe as law of the land, the feminists are off his case.


60 posted on 01/21/2010 11:17:18 PM PST by ari-freedom (Obamacare: nananana nananana hey hey hey goodbye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson