Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/21/2010 9:04:32 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY

Next, they’ll want to remove the cross from inside the scope.....


2 posted on 01/21/2010 9:06:40 PM PST by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

PC Crap!


3 posted on 01/21/2010 9:07:15 PM PST by notaliberal (Palin supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Does anyone really think Iraqis or Afghans would give a good goddamm?


4 posted on 01/21/2010 9:07:48 PM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

What is all the fuss about? The scope is meant to kill some Islamic terrorist SOB. What does any inscription have to do with it. Here we go again with PC idiocy.


5 posted on 01/21/2010 9:09:50 PM PST by Dapper 26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
This is such a lot of p.c. bullcrap its not funny.

A few symbols on our scopes referring to biblical scriptures is so HORRENDOUSLY OFFENSIVE??

Where and how is this grounds for invoking p.c. doctrine?Why are we so literally AFRAID of offending muslim terrorists that we dont dare use Isreali jewish bullets? Much less to have christian scriptural references on our scopes?

6 posted on 01/21/2010 9:10:26 PM PST by prophetic (0Bama = 1 illegal president = 32 illegal, unconstitutional & unnecessary CZARS to do his job!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Etu General? One would think you would have much more on your mind in dealing with an enemy bent upon the death and destruction of all we stand for, including freedom of speech, than to even comment on such a trivial matter.

WTF are we coming to?

Damn!

Just Damn!!!!

7 posted on 01/21/2010 9:11:25 PM PST by ImpBill ("America ... where are you now?" signed, a little "r" republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
President Barack Obama has sought to convince the Muslim world that the U.S. fight against al Qaeda militants should not be viewed as a war against Islam.

Former President George W. Bush heightened those concerns shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington when he referred to his war on terrorism as a "crusade," a remark critics warned raised images of Christian knights attacking Muslim cities during the Middle Ages.

This is such bull s--t!

Bush bent over backwards to make it clear this wasn't a religious war. This is a total rewrite to make Obama look like the reasoned one of the two. That's a complete fabrication.

8 posted on 01/21/2010 9:12:02 PM PST by DoughtyOne (God, Family, Friends, Home, Town, State, the U.S., Conservatism, Free Republic & a dollar a day...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
These people are insane, that's all. Petraeus , McChrystal, Casey care more about being PC--to the extreme--than they care about our soldiers' lives!

Nothing short of a revolution is going to restore our country to sanity.

9 posted on 01/21/2010 9:12:24 PM PST by molybdenum ( Now go do the right thing!------Dr Laura)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Using this logic, no more Nose Plane Art and no more Ordinance Personnel writing messages to our enemies on the 500 pound bombs we put on our aircraft.

If we had to deal with this PC crap 65 years ago, we would have lost WWII.

13 posted on 01/21/2010 9:17:04 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (There is nothing Democratic about the Democrat Party...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

After 3 decades, Trijicon has succumbed to the pressure and is removing the Bible Verse references:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_military_weapons_bible_references

I don’t know what’s worse; the freakin’ godless Libtards who made a big deal out of this, or the gutless Christians at Tijicon who gave up without a fight...

Cheers


14 posted on 01/21/2010 9:17:24 PM PST by DoctorBulldog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I wonder what Patton would have said about this? Ah, nevermind. Those days are gone.


17 posted on 01/21/2010 9:21:11 PM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
What will the Marine Corps do now?


18 posted on 01/21/2010 9:23:29 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
This is bullshit. Petraeus should know better. He's joining the argument on the wrong side.

This is Political Correctness run amok.

Frankly, it's also must be offensive to God as well. There once was a time when when we wanted Him on our side and honored Him. If our Founding Fathers were still around, they would probably grab their muskets off the wall and head out to stop this madness. And they would probably take their Bibles with them as well.

Maybe we should take IN GOD WE TRUST off our coinage as well just to please CAIR and the God-hating pantywaists that infest this country,... and I hate to say it,... our "Defense" Department, too?

F*ck them! God save us from these fools.

24 posted on 01/21/2010 9:35:34 PM PST by Gritty (In the War with Jihadism, identifying the threat is at the heart of success or failure-Walid Phares)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY; Ramius; osagebowman; g'nad; Corin Stormhands
I find it disturbing that people I once respected are knuckling under to something so trivial. Petraeus is now agreeing with the same lowlifes who tried to smear him not so long ago.

Why is it nobody inside the beltway can call this for what it is: trivial BS that's being spun into a major crisis as a test to see how much clout the liberals and their media still have? Why hasn't one person gone on the record saying that this is a phony crisis, and the sights are on the weapons because we want to kill these people, so we don't really care if they're offended or not?

Trijicon was successful when this was a minor "insider" item that "offended" nobody. I'm sorry if they feel that continued business success depends on assuaging the feelings of some RAT liberals who feel their calling in life is to assuage the feelings of moslem terrorist cowards. It would cost tens of millions of dollars to retool their entire product line, but if Trijicon feels this is the best course for their company, so bet it.

Personally, I'd offer the government the choice of buying the existing products at existing prices, or develop a Politically Correct version at double the price. For that price, they could also include materials in arabic explaining while we're eager to kill them, we'd never intentionally or unintentionally offend them.

The saddest part is seeing retired flag officers swallow hard and tow the party line. Perhaps they remember the Clinton years, when pro-Clinton retirees got speaking and consulting gigs, while anybody who spoke up against them could find their pension checks routed into a black hole for months at a time.

25 posted on 01/21/2010 9:43:28 PM PST by 300winmag (Trijicon: enemies quake at the mere mention of the Jesus Scope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Photobucket Photobucket DOD cancelled the Crusader in 2002.
27 posted on 01/21/2010 9:51:05 PM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

No, General dipshit. Disturbing is the PC claptrap your Pentagon put out as a “report” about the Fort Hood jihadist scumbag POS.


28 posted on 01/21/2010 9:51:10 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Any soldier not wanting such on their weapons sight could be given permission to file it off. End of problem.

"Disturbing"? Hardly, but then I am a Christian. If someone were to have references to the Koran, I doubt I'd be able to read them anyway, but I could do the same.

To me, the bottom line is that the company has been doing this for years (decades), and that until someone ginned up a complaint, it wasn't a problem.

If our allies don't like it, let them buy their own scopes.

31 posted on 01/21/2010 9:58:51 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Such astounding idiocy in an otherwise intelligent seeming individual is “disturbing”.

The mohammedans want to butcher you General, enslave your young female relatives and murder the males. A few letters and numbers embossed on a weapons sight isn’t going to make them a graver threat.

Idiot.


33 posted on 01/21/2010 10:08:49 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

We should name our army weapons systems after Muslim names..we already have the M. Should not be to difficult. The M1 can be Muslim1. ya think that would make the left and muslims happy?


39 posted on 01/21/2010 10:50:00 PM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Flames away:
But I agree with Petreous!

If the mil spec for these scopes did not include inscriptions, then the supplier should not be allowed to alter the mil-spec. Thus the supplied equipment does not meet contract, and should not be paid for nor accepted!

How would everyone feel if a Muzzie firm in Michigan got a contract for, say $600 toilet seats, and the firm’s president, Mohammad, ordered his workers to inscribe on them a reference to Jesus?

???????????????????????????


41 posted on 01/21/2010 11:02:59 PM PST by Noob1999 (LOOSE LIPS, SINK SHIPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson