Replies

So because a candidate is supported by the RNC, they are not worthy of our support? Did you support Scott Brown?

a.) The RNC IS the major problem in the GOP.

b.) Again, Scott Brown is irrelevant to this discussion. This is about McCain being returned to the Senate with a history of screwing conservatives six ways from Sunday. Scott Brown has yet to even be sworn in and begin establishing a record that conservatives will either approve of, or be critical of. He's got 2 years to prove himself before he faces the voters again.

Did it ever occur to you that Sarah has more knowledge of the situation than you or I?

No. I submit that conservatives on this (and other) websites actually know MORE about McCain than Sarah does because WE have been doing the study and research required to not only get up to speed regarding McCain's continued treason and undermining of our Constitution and our Republic, we are more fully informed and aware of what is truly at stake. Sarah is unfortunately too close to McCain to see what we see all the time. There may be a personal bond between them and while that is admirable in some respects, it is detrimental in others in that it distorts Sarah's ability to see McCain as he truly is, for example I doubt that she is aware of the following episodes in McCain'is political career, are you?

“The first thing that I would do is call in John Kerry, Bob Kerrey, Joe Biden, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger, Dick Lugar, Chuck Hagel, and several others and say, ‘We’ve got to get foreign policy, national security issues back on track.’”
(When asked the first thing he would do if elected President, March 2000)

“No, I’m calling you a f*cking jerk.”
(to fellow GOP Senator Chuck Grassley, when Grassley asked “Are you calling me stupid?”, Feb 2000)

“F**k you! I know more about this than anyone else in the room!”
(to Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), during an exchange about immigration legislation)

“As a governor and senator, John Chafee set the standard for honesty and decency that the rest of us on our best days could only dream to emulate.”
(John McCain on fellow RINO, ex-senator John Chaffee of Rhode Island.

“John Kerry is a very close friend of mine. We’ve been friends for years. Obviously, I would entertain it.”
(When asked if he would entertain being Kerry’s VP if asked, March 2004)

“Thanks for the question, you little jerk.”
(John McCain, after being asked by a high school student if he was too old to be president. For good measure, McCain then threatened to draft him.)

“By the way, I think the fence is least effective. But I’ll build the goddamned fence if they want it.”
(John McCain, on immigration Feb 2007)

McCain is far from perfect, but that is no reason not to support him now like we did in 2008, to support Sarah now like we did then.

Do you have any idea how stupid that statement of yours is?

So because a candidate is supported by the RNC, they are not worthy of our support?

I did not say that. I like the RNC picks in NH and CO. The worst GOP candidate in the race is not worth our support, in the case of Florida and AZ they want to nominate Crist and McCain. If you support Rubio over Crist why in the world would want McCain over Hayworth? Crist and McCain are very similar.

Did you support Scott Brown?

Yes. And what does that have to do win this?

McCain is far from perfect, but that is no reason not to support him now like we did in 2008,

If JD Hayworth runs there sure is, THERE WOULD BE SOMEONE BETTER IN THE RACE. Duh. McLame is not entitled to support. Remember we are talking about the primary here. It's not McCain versus a rat it's McCain versus a conservative Republican.

Did it ever occur to you that Sarah has more knowledge of the situation than you or I?

Still presuming she just must! be right. No I don't consider that an option. From a conservative perspective she should be urging Hayworth to run not endorsing McCain, that's a no-brainier. I also maintain that I have a better take on bailouts than ex-President Bush did because despite his superior education and experience compared to me to his stance was obviously wrong. (ain't I arrogant for a peon)

She either A)Does not have superior knowledge of the situation B)Is backing McCain purely out of loyalty even though she knows Hayworth would be better. Or there's a possible C)She's not as conservative as we think. I don't think it's C.

Whatever the reason, enabling McCain is a mistake. If you don't think it is I don't know what to say.

We don't need to and shouldn't support every move Palin might make even it's the wrong one. Don't feel you must. You can think she's not perfect and doesn't always make the right decision and still support her.

RE :”Did it ever occur to you that Sarah has more knowledge of the situation than you or I?”

Of course she does. She gets it from above just like GWB did.

And it was Sarah's facebook message that got all those MA liberals to vote for Brown. She killed Health Reform twice, once with 'death panels' and a second time with Brown. No human could do this alone unless they were being guided (wink, wink)
Those that deny that it was Sarah's message that won the MA Coakley/Brown senate race are ‘Palin deniers’ and are either liberal trolls or Romneybots! Only one force could have got the liberals in MA to elect Brown, Sarah!

The plan is president Palin will get illegals to vote for Republicans after she legalizes them(McCain will be her chief of staff). She did it in MA Senate race and will do it with illegals.