Palin and Brown are caught between a rock and a hard place. If they return the favor and help him, they get labeled sellouts here. If they snub him, the MSM label them traitors. The uninformed(who are most of the people)still listen to what the media say. Which scenario is worse?
Well I’ve got a very unique idea for that “between a rock and a hard place” dilemna. How about we just stand up for what we really believe in for a change and let the chips fall where they may? I know it is a novel idea but it seems to appeal to the people.
It’s a but difficult to throw your support and trust behind a candidate when they change positions like underwear.
Sarah is either a conservative or she is not. And the MSM is never going to say anything nice about a republican or a conservative. And the more conservative the nastier they will be. So should conservative candidates pretend that they are not? How are the rest of us supposed to know what they really believe in? This is the kind of stuff that makes people just throw in the towel and stay home.
The stakes are too serious in these future elections to be playing politics in this manner. That was the way of the past and look where it has brought us. Personally, I am not interested in what the left thinks or says about us any longer.
“Palin and Brown are caught between a rock and a hard place. If they return the favor and help him, they get labeled sellouts here. If they snub him, the MSM label them traitors. The uninformed(who are most of the people)still listen to what the media say. Which scenario is worse?”
When caught between that ‘rock and hard place’, the only right thing to do is what is right for the country. And THAT is NOT John McCain.