Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sarabaracuda; rabscuttle385; darkwing104; Old Sarge; 50mm
He is an angry purist who is trying to turn the board against all those who do not fit his narrow-minded definition of conservative.

FReepers don't attack other FReepers on a personal level. On several posts you have made this kind of ad hominum attack which is both poor form and against forum rules. Also, trying to turn the forum against someone who's been around here awhile and is respected is really quite questionable behavior.

You certainly don't have to march in lockstep with anybody here - there are Sarah foes and (very few) McCain supporters but the *manner* in which you argue is *very* important. FReepers debate, they don't fight. (Well, at least we try...)


212 posted on 01/22/2010 2:32:20 AM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: paulycy; rabscuttle385
In what way is that statement an ad hominem? I didn't call anyone an idiot, a troll, or a jerk. Those arguing with me do have a very narrow definition of what it is to be a conservative at least according to who they will and will not support. rabscuttle has attacked both Sarah Palin and her supporters her quite viciously in the past. Why does he get a free pass?
231 posted on 01/22/2010 2:58:02 AM PST by Sarabaracuda (John McCain is good enough for Sarah so he's good enough for me. McCain 2010 / Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson