Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain-Feingold Partially Reversed
ScotusBlog ^ | 01/21/10 | Erin Miller

Posted on 01/21/2010 7:14:00 AM PST by TonyInOhio

From the Live Blog:

Erin Miller: Justice Kennedy writes for the Court.

10:01 Erin Miller: Reversed in part, affirmed in part, and remanded

(Excerpt) Read more at scotusblog.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: johnmccain; mccain; mccainfeingold; mccainhastogo; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 next last
To: Leisler
"I will say, and spend as I please. And if needed will kill and shoot to say what I want, when I want, to whom I want,..."

LOL! Whatever. And BTW, I was and am against McCain's and Feingold's campaign reform that Fred Thompson voted in favor of. It was a gateway of loopholes for Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, George Soros and many other globalists to control our Government. The First Amendment is for free speech--not briberies.


101 posted on 01/21/2010 11:44:29 AM PST by familyop (This is my United States of whatever! cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Three if by government

It’s you that doesn’t get it, you want to justify your whining.


102 posted on 01/21/2010 11:57:49 AM PST by pburgh01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

Look. I had LOD reports on both knees and refused to take offers of taxpayers’ money for fixing them and going on disability. I don’t need any stinkin’ welfare of any kind, including checks from thieving, politically correct contractors or other special interests. ...would rather continue, from time to time, to swing pickaxes and push shovels cheap.

And here we are, with so much in common, arguing back and forth like this. I’m designing a place for a 70 psf snow load (first time making drawings) after decades of chasing cheap manual labor and office jobs managed by incompetents.


103 posted on 01/21/2010 11:59:32 AM PST by familyop (This is my United States of whatever! cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

No surprises there.


104 posted on 01/21/2010 12:03:46 PM PST by Maryhere ("HE comes to rule the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
As rahmbo deadfish said recently when asked about what he thought about free speech, he said “It’s overrated.”

As any fascist, by definition, would say.

105 posted on 01/21/2010 12:03:53 PM PST by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenerio at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: familyop

What is an LOD report?


106 posted on 01/21/2010 12:08:41 PM PST by Dr. North
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Gross’s business is government debt. No socialists, no borrowing no debt no Pimpco.

Eh? You think Gross is a neutral actor?


107 posted on 01/21/2010 12:11:48 PM PST by Leisler (We don't need a third party we need a conservative second party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Three if by government
I like the fact that restrictions on free speech right before the election have been dropped. I like how groups like Citizens United can now express their viewpoint.

I'm not sure how I feel about removing restrictions on corporate free speech. I hate to say it, but Stevens dissent does make some sense where he pointed out that corporations cannot vote or run for office.

Wealthy executives and board members of corporations can always participate in financing campaigns. I encourage them to do that.

But for myself, I can see where corporations, particularly multi-national ones can significantly override individual interests. And restrictions on unions like the SEIU and NEA are eliminated as well, and that's a bit troubling.

108 posted on 01/21/2010 12:17:02 PM PST by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenerio at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: familyop

I committed a felony to enlist in the Army and become a Special Forces medic. I’m 53 and still framing and roofing houses. A couple of nights a week I work the door of a decent gin mill/biker bar and assist people that have had the establishments hospitality “recinded”

I like bribes. I’d like us to go back to direct payments for votes. Worked pretty good.


109 posted on 01/21/2010 12:19:30 PM PST by Leisler (We don't need a third party we need a conservative second party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Yeah, I hear you. Me? A mid thirty foot sailboat in Cuba until I get the big chest pain.


110 posted on 01/21/2010 12:26:22 PM PST by Leisler (We don't need a third party we need a conservative second party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
I was wrong; the Supreme Court CAN find their ass with both hands and a flashlight.

Subject to Justice Kennedy's whims, of course.

111 posted on 01/21/2010 12:36:45 PM PST by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio

Yes! Take that Obama and McCain...this is dynamic


112 posted on 01/21/2010 12:48:37 PM PST by Def Conservative (Obama is a joke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop; All

While I have little taste for government interfering in business, I hope that one result of a government limit on corporate overpayments and bonuses will be to bring jobs back to this country. It seems to me that if top executives are vastly overpaid, then they will keep the stockholders off their backs by shipping as many jobs as possible to low paid countries. If their pay can be reduced to more reasonable levels, then hopefully it will be more cost effective to keep the low level jobs here.


113 posted on 01/21/2010 12:51:30 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
McCains signature legislation violates the constitution?

Am I allowed to say that?

114 posted on 01/21/2010 1:34:14 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
[i]Subject to Justice Kennedy's whims, of course.[/i]

Well, there is that.

115 posted on 01/21/2010 1:46:21 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
If their pay can be reduced to more reasonable levels, then hopefully it will be more cost effective to keep the low level jobs here.

Is your pay "reasonable"?

Who should decide?

116 posted on 01/21/2010 1:56:59 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

You weren’t. But you are now.


117 posted on 01/21/2010 2:17:22 PM PST by Dr. North
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Dr. North

“Line of duty” in regards to injuries. ...torn miniscus in each knee due to being a tall mesomorph and changing directions too quickly while carrying large loads. Time, breaks between jobs, exercise (wide range of movement) with regular aspirin before rest and natural calcium seem to help some.


118 posted on 01/21/2010 2:35:36 PM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

Heh. I’m very near your age (did OSUT at Ft. Leonard Wood at almost 32). But I only did security in dance hall type night clubs while much younger (four of ‘em as extra jobs over the course of several years)—one of them probably much more of a model for “Roadhouse” than anything in Jasper. ;-)


119 posted on 01/21/2010 2:43:18 PM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
He has defied McCain-Feingold

You say that as if it were a bad thing. McCain-Feingold was bad law that should never have been passed. The only "reform" in it was in the title.

2008 will be the last election where a "major" party candidate takes federal matching funds. I don't see that as a bad thing either.

Like it or not, if a candidate wants to get his message out, that candidate and his friends must pay for it. We can't even afford 4 years of Obama, let alone 8. But thanks in part to McCain following stupid campaign restrictions we are blessed with a White House filled with radical communists who hate us and our country.

120 posted on 01/21/2010 2:48:46 PM PST by altair (I hope he fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson