Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/19/2010 5:11:59 PM PST by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: icwhatudo

Fox just announced 4% of vote counted with Brown ahead 52% to 47%.


39 posted on 01/19/2010 5:22:27 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

41 posted on 01/19/2010 5:24:42 PM PST by Minnesocold ("In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

These stats tell us nothing. He needs to give up the goods.


45 posted on 01/19/2010 5:27:32 PM PST by cdchik123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo; All

51 brown 48 cokeheaed as per Oreilly just now


48 posted on 01/19/2010 5:28:12 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (Screaming in Agony they ran to the Government But then Realized from whence the Agony came !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo
Real time city by city results here:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2010/by_county/MA_US_Senate_0119.html?SITE=AP&SECTION=POLITICS

55 posted on 01/19/2010 5:31:34 PM PST by Republican Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

All I know is... If Brown doesn’t win by at least 5 points - the rats will scurry up what they need to steal it.

Just like they always do.


56 posted on 01/19/2010 5:32:17 PM PST by rock_lobsta (zero... YOU LIE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

“* 22% of Democrats voted for Brown. That is generally consistent with pre-election polling. “

If that holds, Brown wins easily. Brown probably needed around 10% of the Dem vote to ensure a win.


57 posted on 01/19/2010 5:33:07 PM PST by coaltrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

8:32PM EST

Brown 52%
Coakley 47%

With 8% Reporting


61 posted on 01/19/2010 5:34:23 PM PST by MrBambaLaMamba (Shouldn't those premium insurance plans Obama wants to tax be referred to as "Chrysler 300M" plans?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
238 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 139,806 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 122,732 46%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 2,434 1%

WBZ TV


63 posted on 01/19/2010 5:35:54 PM PST by pietraynor (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
459 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 254,686 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 224,421 46%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 4,520 1%


68 posted on 01/19/2010 5:44:13 PM PST by pietraynor (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
844 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 441,124 52%
Martha Coakley (D) 392,078 47%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 8,407 1%


78 posted on 01/19/2010 5:53:09 PM PST by pietraynor (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

Howie Carr just said that in Addington (sp?) Brown took 66% of the vote.


80 posted on 01/19/2010 5:55:21 PM PST by moondoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo
* Among those who decided how they would vote in the past few days, Coakley has a slight edge, 47% to 41%.”

Huh?
Exactly what is the relevance of such a poll, AFTER polling has already closed, and actual results are coming in fast?
I mean there were very few “undecideds” in the past few days anyways(approx 1% according to Suffolk University), and any change in that would be irrelevant with Scott Brown leading by over 5% in the;polls), so what's the point of this crap?
Meanwhile, Scott Rasmussen refused to do a proper poll yesterday, and he instead comes up with this meaningless poll today?
Has Scott Rasmussen completely gone off the edge in the last few days?.

101 posted on 01/19/2010 6:17:07 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

Don’t lose faith yet, everyone.
The number of registered Iindependents here is more than the number of Democrats and Republicans combined.

Fox says 4% counted with Brown 53% Coakley 47%.

Don’t lose the faith!


118 posted on 01/19/2010 7:40:19 PM PST by A_Cougar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson