Fox just announced 4% of vote counted with Brown ahead 52% to 47%.
These stats tell us nothing. He needs to give up the goods.
51 brown 48 cokeheaed as per Oreilly just now
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2010/by_county/MA_US_Senate_0119.html?SITE=AP&SECTION=POLITICS
All I know is... If Brown doesn’t win by at least 5 points - the rats will scurry up what they need to steal it.
Just like they always do.
“* 22% of Democrats voted for Brown. That is generally consistent with pre-election polling. “
If that holds, Brown wins easily. Brown probably needed around 10% of the Dem vote to ensure a win.
8:32PM EST
Brown 52%
Coakley 47%
With 8% Reporting
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
238 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 139,806 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 122,732 46%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 2,434 1%
WBZ TV
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
459 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 254,686 53%
Martha Coakley (D) 224,421 46%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 4,520 1%
Senate Special Election - Massachusetts
844 of 2168 Precincts Reporting
NAME VOTES Pct.
Scott Brown (R) 441,124 52%
Martha Coakley (D) 392,078 47%
Joseph Kennedy (I) 8,407 1%
Howie Carr just said that in Addington (sp?) Brown took 66% of the vote.
Huh?
Exactly what is the relevance of such a poll, AFTER polling has already closed, and actual results are coming in fast?
I mean there were very few “undecideds” in the past few days anyways(approx 1% according to Suffolk University), and any change in that would be irrelevant with Scott Brown leading by over 5% in the;polls), so what's the point of this crap?
Meanwhile, Scott Rasmussen refused to do a proper poll yesterday, and he instead comes up with this meaningless poll today?
Has Scott Rasmussen completely gone off the edge in the last few days?.
Don’t lose faith yet, everyone.
The number of registered Iindependents here is more than the number of Democrats and Republicans combined.
Fox says 4% counted with Brown 53% Coakley 47%.
Don’t lose the faith!