1 posted on
01/19/2010 5:11:59 PM PST by
icwhatudo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: icwhatudo
2 posted on
01/19/2010 5:13:14 PM PST by
icwhatudo
("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
To: icwhatudo
Can you provide the link to view the results on the web?
3 posted on
01/19/2010 5:13:40 PM PST by
BushCountry
(We divide into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.)
To: icwhatudo
Oh Sh**!
I hope more information confirms the opposite.
5 posted on
01/19/2010 5:14:26 PM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: icwhatudo
It’s likely around 10 pm est
6 posted on
01/19/2010 5:14:49 PM PST by
Boardwalk
To: icwhatudo
These polls are making me nuts.
7 posted on
01/19/2010 5:14:53 PM PST by
duckman
(My Grandma Isn't Shovel Ready!)
To: icwhatudo
I see he left out the one that really matters - independents. There was a small percentage of undecideds, so I’m not too concern about a slight advantage for Coakley there. It will all come down to the independents.
To: icwhatudo
* Among those who decided how they would vote in the past few days, Coakley has a slight edge, 47% to 41%. That is not good...and it seems counter intuitive to the trends of the recent polls...
10 posted on
01/19/2010 5:15:05 PM PST by
Wyatt's Torch
(I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
To: icwhatudo
i cant look ...too scared
11 posted on
01/19/2010 5:15:28 PM PST by
dalebert
To: icwhatudo
12 posted on
01/19/2010 5:15:30 PM PST by
quantim
To: icwhatudo
Rasmussen showing ankle again!
To: icwhatudo
What's with this “more data will be released soon crap.” The polls are closed. Show your hand Ras or STFU. If you can give us a preview do it. Otherwise we might as well wait for the returns.
Rasmussen is really starting to annoy me.
15 posted on
01/19/2010 5:16:22 PM PST by
fluffdaddy
(Is anyone else missing Fred Thompson about now?)
To: icwhatudo
I started getting worried when this election was starting to be nationalized.
23 posted on
01/19/2010 5:17:13 PM PST by
Darren McCarty
(We do what we have to do.)
To: icwhatudo
To: icwhatudo
WRKO will post by Town as the results come in.
I'm from Norwood and Romney carried it by 54% in 03. If Brown does better it will be a short night.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2010/by_county/MA_Page_0119.html?SITE=WRKO&SECTION=POLITICS
25 posted on
01/19/2010 5:17:27 PM PST by
AU72
To: icwhatudo
22% dem votes for Brown is a good sign.
27 posted on
01/19/2010 5:17:33 PM PST by
uscabjd
To: icwhatudo
30 posted on
01/19/2010 5:18:13 PM PST by
Notwithstanding
(Wer glaubt ist nie allein. Who believes is never alone.)
To: icwhatudo
33 posted on
01/19/2010 5:18:43 PM PST by
Nick Danger
(Free cheese is found only in mousetraps)
To: icwhatudo
If Brown gets 22% of the Dims he will need to carry 60% of the Independents and 100% of the Republicans to get 51% of the total vote.
That’s a pretty tall order. Doable, but tough.
34 posted on
01/19/2010 5:19:22 PM PST by
ought-six
( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: icwhatudo
* Seventy-six percent (76%) of voters for Brown said they were voting for him rather than against Coakley.
Those numbers sound low to me...
To: icwhatudo
What’s wrong this guy? Does he know something we don’t and is not going to let us in on it?
38 posted on
01/19/2010 5:20:40 PM PST by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
