Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Galvin: I Won't Slow Process If Brown Wins
Bostonchannel.com ^ | 1-19-10

Posted on 01/19/2010 12:53:46 PM PST by kingattax

BOSTON -- Secretary of State William Galvin said he will not delay the swearing-in process if Republican Scott Brown is elected to fill the Senate seat formerly held by Ted Kennedy, but would only announce an unofficial winner if the results are decisive.

But Brown warned that Senate Democrats would delay swearing him in if he wins to avoid a 41st vote against the health care bill.

On Tuesday, Sen. John Kerry indicated the Oath of Office would not be rushed.

"I don't think that is possible even under normal circumstances. When I was elected or Ted Kennedy was elected, we had to wait about 10 days, 12 days," Kerry said.

But in Kennedy's case, that was not true. A document from the national archives shows Kennedy's 1962 Senate win did not get certified until weeks after he was sworn into office.

"Whatever is appropriate should be followed. I am not an election expert, an election law expert," Kerry said.

Republicans also point to Rep. Niki Tsongas, who was sworn into Congress days after she was elected to represent Massachusetts' 5th Congressional District.

"The people's will should be done. Regardless of legal niceties, the fact is it is a popularly-elected government, and people who forget that do so at their peril," said Dan Winslow, an attorney for Brown's campaign.

Galvin said politics will not delay him from certifying the results for the governor to sign.

"I am going to do everything that I can to give the winner, whoever that winner is, the credentials they need as soon as possible," Galvin said.

Galvin said he will only announce an unofficial winner to Congress before the results get certified if the outcome is decisive. So if it's close, all absentee votes will be counted, which could take up to 10 days.

"My reputation precedes me. I'm not going to sacrifice my reputation for any race of any kind," Galvin said


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 111th; galvin; ma2010
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 01/19/2010 12:53:47 PM PST by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingattax

When is Galvin up for re-election?


2 posted on 01/19/2010 12:57:06 PM PST by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Translation:

Brown seems like a sure thing.
Democrats are already looking bad.
Obama is already looking bad.
I'm not going to fall on my sword in an effort to help these guys play political ganes. Why should I look bad too?

3 posted on 01/19/2010 12:57:11 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (We have the 1st so that we can call on people to rebel. We have 2nd so that they can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
-- Kennedy's 1962 Senate win did not get certified until weeks after he was sworn into office. --

So Harry Reid's assertion that the Senate MUST wait for certification turns out to be false. No surprise there, Senator Reid is a big fat liar.

4 posted on 01/19/2010 12:57:42 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

RATs, obviously, aren’t getting We The People’s message yet!


5 posted on 01/19/2010 12:58:11 PM PST by ExTexasRedhead (Clean the RAT/RINO Sewer in 2010 and 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I read that Kennedy was sworn in within 24 hours after they declared him winner so he could be the Senior Senator from MA.

I hope Brown only has to wait two years to take that title from Kerry, who has waited and coveted that title for a very long time now.


6 posted on 01/19/2010 12:58:20 PM PST by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Galvin is up this year
i think he wants to get reelected then try for the Governors mansion so he will probably obey the letter of the law


7 posted on 01/19/2010 12:58:59 PM PST by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

If I remember right then the dems quickly confirmed there congressional candidate in NY23. Even before the winner was confirmed by the state. I believe that it was decided that since our candidate conceded the election then this could be done. I bet that Martha has been instructed to not concede, and drag it out for every last minute.


8 posted on 01/19/2010 12:59:31 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

John Effen Liar kerry, once again lying against America.
When Teddy Kennedy was first elected, it was a sopecial election, just like this one, and he was sworn into office in less than 24 hours later.


9 posted on 01/19/2010 1:00:18 PM PST by DGHoodini (Iran Azadi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Other Translation:

"I'm getting ready to retire.. if only I had a bit more money saved.. maybe a boat for fishing... follow me, DNC?"

10 posted on 01/19/2010 1:01:02 PM PST by theDentist (fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

regardless of who wins, isn’t the appointed Kirk’s vote no longer valid by the fact someone was elected


11 posted on 01/19/2010 1:01:59 PM PST by silverleaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I'm not going to fall on my sword in an effort to help these guys play political ganmes

Or, my Rat friends will delay Brown's swearing-in with legal maneuvers, so I don't have to.

12 posted on 01/19/2010 1:04:30 PM PST by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenerio at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Kerry’s an idiot. He had to wait from November to January.

And Kennedy was sworn in the next day.


13 posted on 01/19/2010 1:06:07 PM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
The Democrats cannot even put up the Bill for a vote in the House.

This Bill is going to die in committee.

14 posted on 01/19/2010 1:06:51 PM PST by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Galvin had a lot to say during the 2000 Florida recount. He was all for voter intent on half punched ballots. I don’t trust this guy at all.


15 posted on 01/19/2010 1:10:18 PM PST by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The Democrats can easily draw this thing out by challenging the vote count through repetitive “chad counting” and other such sleazy tricks known to their political party. Hopefully they will not. People across the country are watching this play out with intense interest.


16 posted on 01/19/2010 1:13:06 PM PST by fuzzthatwuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
So Harry Reid's assertion that the Senate MUST wait for certification turns out to be false. No surprise there, Senator Reid is a big fat liar.

You only need to wait if it's a Republican being sworn it. If it's a Democrat --- will that's just different.

17 posted on 01/19/2010 1:17:26 PM PST by Ditto (Directions for Clean Government: If they are in, vote them out. Rinse and repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Conceding the election has nothing to do with it. They may have tried to use that as an excuse, but legally it carries no weight and should not affect a legal process.


18 posted on 01/19/2010 1:17:26 PM PST by chilltherats (First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
I am not an election expert,...said Kerry.

Yeah, we remember 2004.

19 posted on 01/19/2010 1:19:24 PM PST by keepitreal ( Don't tread on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

The kicker may be that the vote has to be certified before Kirk is out of commission.


20 posted on 01/19/2010 1:21:16 PM PST by chilltherats (First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson