To: ColdOne
If Brown wins in Mass, healthcare is dead in the House. Period.
2 posted on
01/19/2010 12:45:32 PM PST by
gov_bean_ counter
(Sarah Palin - For such a time as this)
To: gov_bean_ counter
Do they not realize the change that’s coming? They overplayed their hand. Its over for the DemocRATS.
To: gov_bean_ counter
If they shove healthcare in anyway I believe the revolt will be so bad they wouldnt know what hit them.
4 posted on
01/19/2010 12:47:23 PM PST by
GoCards
("We eat therefore we hunt...")
To: gov_bean_ counter
If Brown wins in Mass, healthcare is dead in the House. Period. Yep.
To: gov_bean_ counter
They’re going to lose a lot of “blue dog” votes.
They’ll lose them simply because of the “closeness” of this race, and a Brown win will double that fear.
30 posted on
01/19/2010 1:18:49 PM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: gov_bean_ counter
If Brown wins in Mass, healthcare is dead in the House. Period.
Yep.
- They only passed the House version by a bare minimum of votes.
- Every single House member is up for reelection in November
- The Massachusetts result shows them just how much the public hates the health care bill.
- Many of the House members in marginal districts have already responded to constituent mails with "I voted for the bill, but I made a very strong stand by insisting the bill contained X" which was in the House version.
- The Senate Bill, which they'd have to pass without ammendement, contains many noxious elements such as the Louisiana Purchase, the Cornhusker Hustle, and the middle-class tax on Cadilac plans that they would have to explain to their constituents.
- Any promise by their Leadership to modify the most noxious aspects of the Senate Plan via future legislation, is a promise made by other Democratics - and they more than anyone else know that such promises can't be trusted.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson