How can you say definitively that an election was rigged before the result comes out? It seems that your response is rigged. If and when Brown wins, you’ll look like a fool.
Paranoia springs eternal.
Also, up until a week ago, the election was considered a forgone conclusion. The Democrat machine had no reason to prepare for an election theft — which, I would imagine, would take more than a week to orchestrate.
SnakeDoc
Because the act of a major media outlet calling it before it is over is an act of propaganda -- a tool of election rigging.
Wake me when you have a real question.
I agree that no one should "definitively" say anything.
But we've seen stories in the last few days about the substantial number of dead people who are still registered to vote in MA. We've seen film of someone handing out absentee ballots on the street on the day of the election. The biggest media outlet is "testing their data" with results which go against virtually all of the recent polls.
I don't know about you, but I don't trust the media, and I don't trust the MA Democrat machine, and I don't trust ACORN.
Am I saying the election has any definite problem? No. But I'm trying to keep my eyes open.
Typically, dim machines prepare to commit fraud as a matter of course. MA dims will be no exception. They will manufacture as many votes as they can. Whether it will be enough to put Croakley over the top is another question.