"Does anybody want to stay after class to get one-on-one with their homework?"
Posted on 01/18/2010 4:51:57 PM PST by Liz
“WHITE HOUSE BRACING FOR SHATTERING LOSS IN MA”
What a comforting headline.
and shes not holding her gut in with an ammo belt
Scott "says" he supports women's right to choose, but he seems to be rubbing their pro-abort noses in the "right to choose" fallacy b/c he further says:
<< he opposes partial-birth abortion,
<< he opposes federal funding for abortion,
<< he supports strong parental notification laws.
He "says" he supports Roe v. Wade but he has NOT promised to protect abortion rights, and has been endorsed by the anti-abortion Massachusetts Citizens for Life.
IMHO as a dedicated pro-lifer, Scott has simply taken a new route to being pro-life......we can all learn from this.
=============================================
Here are some of Scott Brown’s other positions:
He favors the death penalty.
He is against gay marriage.
He questions whether global warming is man-made or natural.
He does not believe waterboarding is torture.
You should be banned for saying Barney Fwank and loins in the same sentence :-)....
Seriously, I talked to a bud here in MI, we make take a red-eye out and volunteer against Bwaney when his competitor starts building up steam.
Bwaney your next....
"Does anybody want to stay after class to get one-on-one with their homework?"
Ben Nelson made it perfectly clear that you can't trust a "pro-life Democrat" so I think it follows that you can't trust a "pro-Abortion Republican".
At this point all we can do is hope that the democrat loses. Let us pray this is not a Pyrrhic victory in the end.
He’s sounding better and better.
Great minds think alike!!
“Vote for Brown. He Has One Hell of a Stimulus Package.”
;)
I'm glad you posted this. I was a little skeptical when Brown surged onto the scene. But, after doing some research, he's not a RINO. While he may not score a 100 from the ACU, he's a solid Republican and a fairly conventional conservative, which makes his showing in MA all the more surprising. He is NOT cut from the same cloth as Collins, Snowe or Graham, to say the least.
No way I’d vote for Brown or Coakly(sp?). Personally, I’m not a republican anymore, so their putting another traitor in their midst is simply the way they operate.
If the guy doesn’t know that it’s evil to kill babies, then he doesn’t believe anything is truly evil. It’s all simply negotiable.
God told Jeremiah: “Before you were formed in the womb I knew you...”
nhwingut says “Oh, my...
I grew up and lived in Mass until about 10 years ago.
Other than the day I was married and the birth of my children, tomorrow could quite possibly be the happiest day of my life.”
I know how you feel. I lived in Mass until 1984. As a kid I watched the debate between drunk Teddy and his opponent Edward McCormack back in 1962. I watched Teddy get fatter and drunker as the years passed. I watched him leave a naive little girl trapped in his car to die as he planned his own Houdini act. I watched drunk Teddy turn his Catholic heritage into support for the cold blooded killing of 40 million innocent children since Roe v Wade in 1973. I watched drunk Teddy sell the good residents of Mass down the river for 47 years. Eventually the damage done by drunk Teddy negatively affected the residents of all 50 states. Now we finally get a chance to encourage Massachusetts patriots to reclaim their just heritage. It was heroic and strong men and women from Mass who gave our country life at the very beginning. Now the voters of Massachusetts can give new life to America and make amends for the 47 year nightmare which was drunk Teddy.
Massachusetts citizens lived through 84 years of torture when the Red Sox failed to win a world series. For me, the win tomorrow night by Scott Brown will feel like it did in 2004 when the Red Sox finally came through, except it will feel even better because stopping the democRAT takeover of everything in our lives is so much more important. Go Scott Brown and Go Massachusetts patriots.
I hope that it's opposition to Coakley/Obama policies and not primarily campaign tactical mistakes that would put a republican into MA.
But MA needs to prove itself to the nation. There have been waaaay too many years of tolerated Kennedy shenanigans and liberal policy preferences for MA to be considered to have its head screwed on straight.
All due respect to MA freepers, of course.
We can't really believe Planned Parenthood, and that ilk, think Scott is in their camp.
SCOTT'S IS HARDLY A PRO-ABORTION POSITION Scott "says" he supports women's right to choose, but he seems to be rubbing their pro-abort noses in the "right to choose" fallacy b/c he further says:
<< he opposes partial-birth abortion,
<< he opposes federal funding for abortion,
<< he supports strong parental notification laws.
He "says" he supports Roe v. Wade but he has NOT promised to protect abortion rights, and has been endorsed by the anti-abortion Massachusetts Citizens for Life.
IMHO as a dedicated pro-lifer, Scott has simply taken a new route to being pro-life......we can all learn from this.
=============================================
Here are some of Scott Brown’s other positions:
He favors the death penalty.
He is against gay marriage.
He questions whether global warming is man-made or natural.
He does not believe waterboarding is torture.
Thanks for those policy recaps.
If Coakley loses the spin will be that DumBO kept her from being a disaster and that shows his strength and of his policies. If Coakley is a loser, the spin is ZerO is not.
Doesn't matter to the holier-than-thou FReepers.
You see, Brown has to issue a decree from a scroll tablet declaring all abortions illegal.
Not sure why you are yelling at me. First, I wasn’t taking planned parenthoods word. I was taking Scott Brown’s, his official position is that abortion should always be legally available. That IMHO isn’t pro life. Yes he does agree to limitations on abortion and for that he is a better choice than ANY liberal. But he isn’t conservative on this issue, he is more moderate.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2431650/posts
Post 17
Too bad he is still open on GW. It would be better if he said “GW is a massive hoax by the intelligentsia to exercise control over every aspect of your lives>
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.