Posted on 01/17/2010 9:54:12 PM PST by rabscuttle385
His supporters say the book will show Romney is more thoughtful than Sarah Palin.
BY KENNETH T. WALSH
Friends of Mitt Romney say his upcoming book, No Apology: The Case for American Greatness, is a lengthy and detailed explanation of his philosophy and should be a fitting prelude to a 2012 presidential campaign if Romney decides to run. The book, which comes out March 2, seems designed to position Romney as a thoughtful conservative who has ruminated carefully about the major issues of the day, ranging from the global economy to national security.
Romney supporters say it will serve as a conservative contrast to the views of President Obama but also will show Romney to be far more thoughtful than former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who is also considering a 2012 run. Her book, Going Rogue, is a bestseller, but it has apparently done little to improve her reputation as a thinker and a leader who can reach out beyond her conservative base and master the complicated challenges of national office.
(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.com ...
We have janitors at MY 'law firm', too!
(Sorry, janitors...)
Loved the animated gif, too!
Perhaps you were out that day in Catechism.
Here, this will help:
http://mi.byu.edu/publications/review/?vol=13&num=2&id=394
http://www.catholic.com/library/Distinctive_Beliefs_of_Mormon.asp
http://www.catholic.com/library/Mormon_Stumpers.asp
http://www.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=0036mq
You post this so often.
I am beginning to wonder if you are really a double agent.
Sure. And I'm Mickey Mantle.
See, there's that pesky Christian Doctrine that mormons don't adhere to. Kinda makes all the difference in the world. Please look into it.
Operative word here is become. (Ask colorcountry, reaganaut, szonian & thousands of others!)
Only a fool, his pride, and his money would consider running again.
Out of all those people running for president, Mitt was the only one of them who was not getting a government check.
But now, I don't see how Mitt can even fathom a run because frankly, he's too liberal or too evasive on a lot of the issues important to me as a voter.
Some things I will not compromise on.
(And the Republicans need to duct tape McCain's face as well and forget Giuliani.)
I’ll take a common sense Conservative (like Sarah) over a thoughtful “Conservative” (snicker) like Romney any day!
Joe Smith lead mormons astray; straight into a cult. The mormons rejected Christianity in the 1,800's and now want back in. How can that happen, when they reject orthodox Christianity?
It's a lose/lose situation for them. All because of the fake profit that they have chosen to follow.
So much to read, so you can begin here if you'd like.
Romney has already struck out; he's out of cards. He will never be a Republican nominee, not only because he is a RINO and a fake conservative, but also (and most importantly) because he is a mormon in a Nation predominantly comprised of Christians, and a whole heck of us that see and realize the difference.
I agree with you to a degree but, tell me, who defined what the church is and who said this in your Gospel:
“Wherever more than two of you are gathered for my namesake, there shall I be in your midst.”
The quote surely is from Jesus, but that transation appears different from what I recall.
No, that is not what the Gospel says...
Try these...
“If they do not listen to Moses and the prohets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.”
Dash, I’m not a Biblical theolgian, and I’m not sure where you’re headed in this with the Abraham quote.
1. You’re lying; or
2. You’re not thinking (that’s a nice way of saying ...).
That’s all I have to say about your horrid post to me.
And notice that I’m not asking for your answer if it’s #1 or #2 above, because frankly I don’t care.
Let me say this again, I don’t THINK this horrid stuff let alone post it (stupid) for everyone to see — and I don’t care who it’s about — John McCain, Sarah Palin, etc.,etc. It’s not Mormon, it’s not Catholic, it’s not Jewish — it’s not God-like, AND it’s not ADULT-like.
I am still thinking "double agent", and I think you misunderstand.
I do not think it is for the left by any means.
I think you really are hard core conservative but by being such a caricature of a Romney supporter, a "Romneybot" if you will, you are helping the Conservative cause that opposes him. Ergo a double agent.
It really is quite brilliant if true, which I hope it is, because if you really are this enamored (and fooled) by Mitt...
Well I may have to reevaluate that "working for the left thing" even if it is unintentional by ignorance or blind love for Romney.
I was quoting Jesus...
Glenn Beck saying it was Romney’s turn to be the nominee,
- - - - - -
WAIT. Did GB really say THAT?!?!
If so, Wow, just Wow.
Typical. Can’t defend so the next step is deflection.
Let me know when you get to name calling...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.