Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zakeet
[Brown] said he shares the same position on abortion as the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy.

Lovely. I wouldn't be supporting him (I don't live in MA, but I contributed a few dollars to his campaign) if there were any other option, because he is clearly a RINO. However, just getting a GOPer into that seat and preventing Bambi from getting his "health" monstrosity through will probably do a lot to prevent abortions in and of itself.

But if Brown gets the seat, I hope we can work on him to make him realize how important it is to oppose abortion (which is also the camel's nose under the tent for a host of other life issues).

6 posted on 01/17/2010 7:53:17 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: livius
Conservatives don't have too many choices in Massachusetts. The best pro-life thing we can do is get Brown elected because Obamacare would have Americans pay for abortion! And that's plain wrong, any way you look at it.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

10 posted on 01/17/2010 7:57:59 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: livius

“[Brown] said he shares the same position on abortion as the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy. “

You’re missing the point. The problem is NOT the Snowes, Chaffees, or Browns. Electing moderate Republicans in Blue States is a good thing - A GOOD THING - not a bad thing.

Where we screw up completely is in the Red States - why don’t we have 2 DeMints from South Carolina? Why not 2 Coburns? The problem is the Dorgans, Grahams and Nelsons. If we were nominating and electing conservative Republicans in red states across the board with a smattering of moderates in blue states, we would have 70 SEVENTY seats in the Senate.


18 posted on 01/17/2010 8:09:44 AM PST by lowtaxsmallgov (Low Tax Small Govt - we can do it! Donate to Scott Brown https://www.icontribute.us/scottbrown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: livius
Taking abortion off the table may just be good politics right now. It's going to be a long time before the Senate has an abortion-related vote anyway.
41 posted on 01/17/2010 8:57:09 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: livius

To your last statement, YES WE CAN!


62 posted on 01/17/2010 10:08:29 AM PST by Red in MA (ate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: livius
You nitwits need to get this through your thin skulls. Scott Brown is NOT going to be a vote to overturn RvW. It's not that GD important. What is important is the future of the Republic. Scott will be a reliable vote on 99% of Conservative issues. And just an FYI, he's in favor of parental notification.
70 posted on 01/17/2010 12:21:47 PM PST by HenpeckedCon (According to the commander in chief, Allah Akbar means "live long and prosper!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: livius
Did you ever try telling a Pro-Choicer that you too are Pro-Choice? As in Pro Choice for the baby?

If you would ask the child 20 years down the road if he would chose his abortion or his life, most likely he would chose life. So, yes I am definitely Pro-Choice.

I like confusing Pro-Abortionists that way. They just look at me quite stunned.

77 posted on 01/17/2010 4:27:30 PM PST by Chgogal (American Mugabe, get your arse out of my bank, my car, my doctor's office & my elec. utility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson