Skip to comments.
Will candidate Scott Brown stun Democrats, slow agenda?
The Valley Breeze ^
| 1/15/2010
| TOM WARD
Posted on 01/15/2010 7:57:18 AM PST by KeyLargo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last

Samuel Parris (1653-1720)
Martha Coakley has been compared to Samuel Parris, one of the main prosecutors in the Salem Witch trials.
1
posted on
01/15/2010 7:57:20 AM PST
by
KeyLargo
To: KeyLargo
Brown has another thing going added to Dem corruption, he’s in a state where residents like rooting for the underdog (redsox)
2
posted on
01/15/2010 8:01:00 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: KeyLargo
WALLSTREET JOURNAL
* OPINION
* JANUARY 14, 2010, 10:35 P.M. ET
Martha Coakley’s Convictions
The role played by the U.S. Senate candidate in a notorious sex case raises questions about her judgment.
The story of the Amiraults of Massachusetts, and of the prosecution that had turned the lives of this thriving American family to dust, was well known to the world by the year 2001. It was well known, especially, to District Attorney Martha Coakley, who had by then arrived to take a final, conspicuous, role in a case so notorious as to assure that the Amiraults’ name would be known around the globe................
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704281204575003341640657862.html
3
posted on
01/15/2010 8:01:48 AM PST
by
KeyLargo
To: 1Old Pro
Terrible Realities: Why Both the Left and Right Oppose Coakleys Prosecutorial Overreach
By Bronwyn’s HarborgravatarcloseAuthor: Bronwyn’s Harbor Name: Bronwyn’s Harbor Was My Valley
Email: bronwyn@obamanot.com
Site: http://
About: See Authors Posts (194) on January 15, 2010 at 7:45 AM in Current Affairs
Merritts three recently expressed reservations, listed below, center on Coakleys pivots around hot potato issues based entirely on Coakleys whatever-it-takes political motives. Coakley also comes across as the nightmare image of a prosecutor, hellbent on winning a case no matter what tricks, including the manipulation of children, are required in order for her to win her case...
http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2010/01/15/terrible-realities-why-both-the-left-and-right-oppose-coakley/
4
posted on
01/15/2010 8:08:20 AM PST
by
KeyLargo
To: KeyLargo
5
posted on
01/15/2010 8:08:25 AM PST
by
hoosiermama
(ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
To: 1Old Pro
Freepers Unite: Send contributions to Scott Brown for Senate! Any amount will help! I’ve contributed twice over the last three days.
To: KeyLargo
I think it may be safe to begin calling her Martha CRoakley
7
posted on
01/15/2010 8:18:14 AM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, islam will cover the earth with darkness for a thousand years.)
To: KeyLargo
A Brown victory wouldn't just slow Obama's agenda. It would pulverize it. Nothing that had to go through Congress would pass. No Obamacare, no Cap and Trade, no anything. God willing, no amnesty either. He wouldn't have the 60th vote, and the marginal Democrats would run from the Obama's agenda like scalded dogs.
8
posted on
01/15/2010 8:20:06 AM PST
by
Plutarch
To: hoosiermama
9
posted on
01/15/2010 8:21:12 AM PST
by
RDasher
("El Nino is climate, La Nina is weather")
To: KeyLargo
A Brown victory wouldn't just slow Obama's agenda. It would pulverize it. Nothing that had to go through Congress would pass. No Obamacare, no Cap and Trade, no anything. God willing, no amnesty either. He wouldn't have the 60th vote, and the marginal Democrats would run from the Obama's agenda like scalded dogs.
10
posted on
01/15/2010 8:21:12 AM PST
by
Plutarch
To: Balding_Eagle
0 will sh!t sharp, pointy bricks.
11
posted on
01/15/2010 8:22:29 AM PST
by
tgusa
(Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger ....)
To: Plutarch
The Democrats still think the 2009 off year election was just a fluke. If it happens in Massachusetts, no Democrat anywhere in the country is safe. The DNC isn't looking forward to a nationalized election.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus
12
posted on
01/15/2010 8:23:50 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Plutarch
Only if the NRC puts a gun to Snowe and Collins’ heads. But, the NRC might even grow a pair if Brown pulls it off.
13
posted on
01/15/2010 8:24:15 AM PST
by
tgusa
(Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger ....)
To: Plutarch
A Brown victory wouldn't just slow Obama's agenda. It would pulverize it. Nothing that had to go through Congress would pass. No Obamacare, no Cap and Trade, no anything. God willing, no amnesty either. He wouldn't have the 60th vote, and the marginal Democrats would run from the Obama's agenda like scalded dogs.It would definitely help, but it may be to late on HC. Coming out of conference it will be an up or down vote. 51 to 49 will pass it.
At this point it will have to be stopped in the House. Which is still possible.
14
posted on
01/15/2010 8:24:43 AM PST
by
RDasher
("El Nino is climate, La Nina is weather")
To: tgusa
15
posted on
01/15/2010 8:25:19 AM PST
by
tgusa
(Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger ....)
To: KeyLargo
A month ago I wouldn’t have believed it, but now I’ beginning to think Scott Brown could very well pull it off.
To: Non-Sequitur
From your lips to God’s ears.
17
posted on
01/15/2010 8:34:43 AM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(Bush at his worst was still better than Obama at his best.)
To: RDasher
It would definitely help, but it may be to late on HC. Coming out of conference it will be an up or down vote. 51 to 49 will pass it. Nope, the bill from 'conference' will be different, and thus cloture still applies.
18
posted on
01/15/2010 8:43:01 AM PST
by
Plutarch
To: RDasher
Fantastic video that should be seen by all.
19
posted on
01/15/2010 8:47:55 AM PST
by
hoosiermama
(ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
To: tgusa
Snowe and Collins may very well wish to keep their jobs.
They’ll take a look at the results from MA, and rightly determine that voting for Obamacare will lose them votes, not get them votes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson