This is so exciting!
You also notice the Messiah has been told to stay far far away from this race.
ping
Our chance to defeat healthcare. Please pray.
Wow, keep the waves coming!
Brown outs....BROWN OUTS!!!
This news ought to make Martha real twitchy....maybe she’ll shoot herself in the foot again.
People actually like Brown as a person, and people who otherwise would have given in to the apparent inevitability of the dem taking this election are now enthused because there is a chance.
The enthusiasm for Brown is amazing, but the apathy toward Coakley is stunning.
Calm down, folks. It ain’t Tuesday yet.
This is just a poll. I hope Brown isn’t peaking too soon.
And I’m not sure votes are all that count this time. No telling what kind of shenanigans the Dems have up their sleeves — or how many folks they’re busing in with fake IDs.
Hope Brown has plenty of poll watchers and lawyers ready to roll. This may not be pretty.
got a ping list? spread the news!
These polls are all over the place. Brown down by 15% in one. Brown up 1% in another. Brown down by 9% in one poll. Brown up by 4% in another.
The one thing all the polls have in common is Coakly is above or close to 50% in all of them. She is going to be tough to beat in the most Liberal state in the union. Browns only hope is Liberal voters stay home in droves.
Another thing to keep in mind the SEIU has arrived in Boston. Ballot boxes will be stuffed in favor of Coakly.
I don’t know if people realize this or not; but democrats may be feeling secure in passing the healhcare bill knowing if they don’t get what they want off the bat; they can go in and add amendments without the the publics consent or knowledge. They can do pretty much anything they want. That’s why this bill can not pass in any form.
The microcephalic prune is desperate.
Expect more campaign blunders over the long weekend.
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/columnists/view.bg?articleid=1225744
Scott Brown present in absentee voters’ minds
By Howie Carr
Friday, January 15, 2010 - Updated 32m ago
Boston Herald Columnist
Oh yes, the “stalkers” are out there. Just ask Martha Coakley, the wrinkly attorney general who is not “privy” to the facts of the assault on the reporter on Capitol Hill, or so she says.
Yes, the stalkers are out there, and what they are stalking is the state’s city and town halls, taking absentee ballots. Let’s go straight to the numbers, as of closing time Wednesday afternoon.
We can begin with my own hometown, Wellesley. In one business day, Wednesday, the number of absentee ballots cast went from 741 to 869. Next door, in Weston, the number went from 341 to 437.
Are these Scott Brown voters, or are these moonbats who are voting for Martha Coakley because they’re wondering where the heck did she get that accent, coming from “struggling” North Adams and all?
I’m not saying Scott Brown is going to win Tuesday. All I want to do here is pass on some of the numbers of absentee ballots in various towns over the past 48 hours:
Newton, 1158 as of 5 p.m. Tuesday, to 1490 Wednesday
Plymouth, 787 to 921
Scituate, 407 to 509
Weston, 341 to 437
Weymouth, 537 to 661
It becomes increasingly clear, Scott Brown is winning among the people who work for a living, as opposed to Democrats, who are Martha’s voters.
You want some more absentee numbers, and how they increased from Tuesday until Wednesday?
......
Great news! I’m actually quite surprised that Kennedy isn’t geting a lot more than 3% in the polls given the brain-dead name association.
To Mass Freepers, heck if you live anywhere in New England.....
A message to all members of BrownBrigade
Brown Brigade Members,
Join us for the BOLD NEW LEADERSHIP Bus Tour this Saturday. We are only a few days away from a historic victory and we need to show Massachusetts that the grassroots is behind Scott Brown.
Join us for a rally at 9:00 am this Saturday January 16th at the Thomas Crane Public Library in Quincy
Thomas Crane Public Library
40 Washington Street
Quincy, MA
Please RSVP
And we will be stopping at our Plymouth Campaign office at 11 AM:
Brown for US Senate Campaign
74 Long Pond Road
Plymouth, MA
And at 2 pm we will be stopping at Tommy Doyle’s in Hyannis.
334 Main Street
Hyannis, MA
Stay tuned for more information about our Sunday and Monday stops.
-Pete Fullerton
Political Director
Visit BrownBrigade at: http://brownbrigade.ning.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network
The wider the margin, the harder it will be to get away with election hijinks - which the dims will undoubtedly pull.
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/politics/view.bg?articleid=1225720
whack that poll on the right side, while you’re there....
good ol’ Boston Herald...maybe I’ll order it delivered.
http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2010/01/14/martha-coakley-nuns-are-bad-pedophiles-are-good/
Martha Coakley: Nuns are Bad, Pedophiles are Good.
No, seriously. I didn\’t believe it either.
Posted by Leon H. Wolf (Profile)
Thursday, January 14th at 9:34PM EST
18 Comments
Every once in a while a combination of stories comes along in politics that is so bizarre you can’t believe you’re actually writing about it. This is one of those times. Fresh after taking a run at Fenway Park fans in a public interview yesterday, Martha Coakley decided today that she’d insult another institution nobody in Massachusetts gives a crap about: Nuns. Here she is discussing why Nuns shouldn’t be allowed to work in Catholic Hospitals - private institutions that have zero problem with accomodating the consciences of the nuns:
Ken Pittman: Right, if you are a Catholic, and believe what the Pope teaches that any form of birth control is a sin. ah you don’t want to do that.
Martha Coakley: No we have a seperation of church and state Ken, lets be clear.
Ken Pittman: In the emergency room you still have your religious freedom.
Martha Coakley: (…stammering) The law says that people are allowed to have that. You can have religious freedom but you probably shouldn’t work in the emergency room.
Okay. So a private employee of a private company doesn’t want to perform a particular duty because of her religious beliefs, and her private employer has no problem accomodating that… and this somehow constitutes a violation of the First Amendment? I suppose it’s hypothetically possible that Martha Coakley is stupid enough to actually believe this manifest crap (and as this campaign goes on, it becomes more believable!), but the more likely explanation of course is that she finds the nuns icky and just wants them out of sight where she doesn’t have to look at them when she goes out in public. And believe me? Plenty of Massachusetts Catholics are gonna take that last sentence exactly that way. So, to review, in the last two days, Martha Coakley has, in public interviews, dissed A) Fenway Park and B) Nuns. Like my inestimable colleague Moe Lane, I am forced to wonder whether she has any public comments she’d like to share about clam chowder?
WAIT. THIS STORY GETS WORSE.
While Nuns and Fenway Park are on Martha Coakley’s bad list, it turns out she has a good list. Know who’s on it? Pedophiles.
Read on below the fold…