Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yoe

Responding to a bunch of comments on this thread:

No, he is not a credible candidate for president. The GOP would not make that mistake.

No, he would not be a good head of the RNC to replace Michael Steele. He reminds people of the old ethically challenged GOP.

Yes, he will now always be a reminder of sitting on the couch with Ms. Pelosi. We don’t need any of that.

We also don’t need any compromising on “man-made global warming” and Newt’s prescriptions for addressing that and a myriad of issues that he’s gone “progressive” on.

Newt is probably a bit more realistic as a GOP leader than Pat Buccannan. He’s a smart guy, but he let his ego and desire to be loved get in the way of using his considerable brain. And then there’s his personal life...


33 posted on 01/14/2010 8:09:53 AM PST by ReleaseTheHounds ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ReleaseTheHounds
"Newt is probably a bit more realistic as a GOP leader than Pat Buccannan."
pat buchanan is a moron
55 posted on 01/14/2010 8:41:46 AM PST by joe fonebone (A third party does need the majority to control the house...they only need 10%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

Excellent summation!


69 posted on 01/14/2010 9:51:12 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson