Climategate: How to Hide the Sun

American Thinker ^ | January 14, 2010 | Dexter Wright

[dixjea]

Absolutely giddy to be reading these reports. The truth will out.

[Talisker]

Great post.

[justa-hairyape]

These pukes never matured beyond the college mindset. Science is not a game that must be won at all costs. It is a pursuit of the truth. Explains why I gave up even debating them in my field of expertise. One of my immature antagonist was also located at Penn State (not climate related).

[SpaceBar]

Being stripped of their academic credentials, losing their prestigious chairs, and criminal charges for conspiracy to commit fraud to obtain grant money would be a fitting end to the corrupt CRU climate “researchers” and anyone who colluded with them.

[arthurus]

With today's speed of technological advancement it is conceivable that such a project might be doable. The likelihood, of course, is if it can be done it will be done and the results will NOT be what are projected, Liberals live in a world wherein analyses are only half thought out or even manipulated until they agree with preconceived conclusions and ranges of possible results are not even considered beyond the determination that the applied technique will bring about the desired result.

Chances are if they can ever do this thing the results will be very different from what they imagine. Hubris is a wondrous thing and very dangerous in powerful minds.

[SpaceBar]

Did you even read the article? “Hiding the sun” is a euphimism for academic fraud, not the plot of an episode of the Simpsons.

[arthurus]

I confess I did not. I have read proposals for huge plastic or electronic shields that appeared to be seriously proffered as a way to compensate for the AGW and assumed the same here.

[Southack]

"What is significant about this paragraph is that it identifies the main cause of climate change as "solar forcing," not carbon dioxide (CO2)."

No. That paragraph claimed that solar was the most powerful **external** force. CO2 is an internal force.

Say the above without noting "external" and all of your other points will be debunked by a corrupt news media. Don't give them an easy target.

[SpaceBar]

Well at least you’re honest about it. Really had me scratching my head there for a bit.

[steelyourfaith]

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[chris37]

"No, not while my greatest nemesis still provides our customers with free light, heat and energy. I call this enemy the sun. ... -C. Montgomery Burns.

[chris37]

But euphemisms aren’t as fun as plots from the Simpson’s.

See post # 12 pls.

[mapmaker77]

Very correct, but it probably won’t happen. These are the ones in the middle of the food chain who are “Useful Idiots”. And, they have done their jobs because there are at least two generations of Americans who believe this noise is sacrosanct. Let’s give all of the CRU experts a one-way ticket to sunny Antarctica so they can appreciate it up close and personal.

[NY.SS-Bar9]

Hold off on “Giddy”

We are in a deep solar minimum, and at the end of an interglacial.

Things could get real bad in the next 20 years if the sun continues it’s current trend.

[GBA]

It's good to see this information getting out. Despite the efforts of so-called scientists to hide the truth and others to promote superstition, our understanding of our planet and our relationship with the sun grows.

And as a side benefit, we are also getting many lessons about human nature and the importance of character, honesty and integrity.

[BipolarBob]

Revelation 16:8,9

[dixjea]

“We are in a deep solar minimum, and at the end of an interglacial.

Things could get real bad in the next 20 years if the sun continues it’s current trend.”

You mean cold?

[editor-surveyor]

We need sheriff Joe Arpaio to investigat these creeps!

[NY.SS-Bar9]

I mean end-of-civilization cold.