Posted on 01/13/2010 9:21:43 PM PST by Steelfish
Judge Cites Discrimination in N.Y. Fire Dept.
By AL BAKER January 13, 2010
A federal judge ruled on Wednesday that New York City intentionally discriminated against black applicants to the Fire Department by continuing to use an exam that it had been told put them at a disadvantage. It was not a “one-time mistake or the product of benign neglect,” wrote the judge, Nicholas G. Garaufis of Federal District Court in Brooklyn. “It was a part of a pattern, practice and policy of intentional discrimination against black applicants that has deep historical antecedents and uniquely disabling effects.” A remedy will be decided on later.
In his decision, the judge highlighted how “black and other minority firefighters have been severely underrepresented,” characterizing that as a “persistent stain on the Fire Department’s record.” City officials said that they intended to appeal the decision, but could not do so until the judge had determined what damages the city might face.
Legal experts, as well as lawyers for the plaintiffs and city officials, said the decision was the first in recent memory in which a court had found that the city had intentionally discriminated against a large group of people — racial minorities or women, for instance — in the workplace.
“I can’t recall there ever being a finding of intentional racial discrimination in a pattern-and-practice case against the city,” said Elise C. Boddie, a professor of constitutional law at New York Law School who formerly litigated employment discrimination cases. “I would say this is pretty big.” In July, Judge Garaufis — acting on a claim being pushed by the United States Justice Department — ruled that the Fire Department used a test in 1999 and 2002 that had a discriminatory effect on black applicants.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
I call BS...this is New Haven all over again.
Cutting to the chase...
Yes, Garaufis is a Clinton scumbag, and therefore must be presumed to be corrupt to the core.
A real piece of sh%%.
“A federal judge ruled on Wednesday that New York City intentionally discriminated against black applicants to the Fire Department by continuing to use an exam that it had been told put them at a disadvantage.”
I don’t get it. Just what kind of test could that be? Where are those details? Give me a break.
I wuz thinkin' the same thing ...
And just HOW is it discriminatory - does not say in the article ...
Buffy and Chip's house burned down after a dinner party with a Mediterranean theme in which candles were placed too close to the drapes.
What wine was served with the entree?
I wonder if those same black applicants would do any better if the tests were all written in ebonics? Ahh... I suspect that the “remedy” will end up being separate tests, one for whites and a very different one for blacks.
What’s ironic is that every time a judge makes a pandering, idiotic, racial preference ruling like this one, a few scattered Democrats take notice and finally pull their heads out of their behinds. The cumulative effect can only help save decent, traditional America in the long run.
I’m not a firefighter myself, but I knew several in EMT school. It sounded like the tests were essentially “the theory of fire”...how will it react, what can you do to make it do what you want, what makes what kind of fire and how do you safely put it out. I can’t see any way it could have been discriminatory, except against non-studiers.
One has to know (guess) 30% of the correct answers to pass.
One has to know (guess) 30% of the correct answers to pass.
The dirty little secret that the media is afraid to report..In order to have an FDNY job, you cannot have a criminal record and must be able to pass a drug screen. In the minority neighborhoods they want applicants to come out of, this presents a pretty big obstacle.
You have to understand how scumbag liberals "think" - - they "think" backwards.
The test itself is irrelevant. The results (ie., blacks didn't score as well as whites) PROVE that the test MUST BE discriminatory. That is all that matters to the scumbags. The fact that EVERY test is "discriminatory" by this standard is also irrelevant.
Liberal backwards "thinking"...
Don't worry about it - - your head will explode if you try to figure it out.
Let the FDNY train some of these failed applicants, then lock the judge and the family in their house, then set the house on fire ...
The failed applicants would then be on duty at the local fire house when the call comes in ...
Lets see how the judge grades their ability as they try to rescue the judge and his family ...
Excellent post.
Back in the 70’s in the Northeast the civil service written exam consisted of a test that had all questions coming out of book on Firefighting that the applicant had in his possession to study months before the exam. That was ruled not fair to minorities! The answers are in the book you were given. The test material was on the job you were applying for, Firefighting. Do we test doctors on how to run electrical wires in a commercial building??? No, we test them on their medical knowledge. This country is so screwed up it is beyond repair.
How can a test be discriminatory? Maybe it was not given in a oral fashion with the questions read to the applicants and the applicants giving oral answerer's? Thus not requiring them to be able to read and write?
I’d like to see a copy of the exam !
Now think about this for a minute.
If it is easy to develop a test where blacks score lower, even if one tries hard not to, and almost impossible to devise a test where whites score lower, this tells us a lot about the populations we are testing.
Did the city insist on long form birth certificates?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.